Extra money paid to professors help to increase the quality of education.
There is a serious competition between universities to attract students, which implies constant efforts to increase the level of education. Some people think that the quality of education has nothing to do with financial considerations. Meanwhile, many others argue that salaries of teachers is the key issue. Personally, I am prone to believe that extra money may help to better organize the educational process. There are several reasons for that, which will be discussed in the following issue.
To begin with, spending more money on salaries for tutors helps them to concentrate solely on the classes they deliver. Nowadays, it is quite difficult to earn sufficient amount of money only being involves in the educational system. This is why many professors have to work in several places and divide their efforts accordingly. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Thus, in order to be able to cover my rent and living expanses along with tutoring I had to work in two additional places, which, of course affected the lever of my lectures. So, extra money enables tutors to focus on their main functions, which impacts the level of teaching a lot.
Also, high earnings create possibility for the teachers to work only in one educational institution. Teaching in several schools or universities simultaneously is a rather widespread phenomenon, whereas the negative consequences of this practice are obvious. For instance, it reduces incentives to engage in research and development, which are essential for the quality of education. Therefore, the schools and universities try to limit other activities of their professors in order to involve them in the research activities.
Finally, the relevant studies also indicate the efficiency of paying high salaries to teachers. Thus, the research conducted by Ivy League universities showed a link between high salaries and the level of probability of finding a job after graduating by the students. According to the analysis graduates of universities, which pay 100,000 USD or more annually to their professors are more likely to find a job within three months period after graduating, that students of other entities.
To sum up briefly, paying high salaries affects the level of education because the tutors get the opportunity to work in one institution and to conduct scientific work, and because the studies prove this statement as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-16 | Anurag96 | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-16 | Anurag96 | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-23 | Nina Tsarevich | 76 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | 57454751 | 83 | view |
| 2022-10-05 | cocoza@gmail.com | 76 | view |
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively that they are asked to work alone on projects. 76
- Some young children spend a great amount of their time participating in sports. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. 76
- This material addresses the questions of whether the zebra mussel's invasion to North America might be stopped, and whether this fish would dominate in their new habitat. 81
- Tpo 44Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are relate 70
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e studies prove this statement as well.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, briefly, finally, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, of course, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27864583333 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96529289756 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552083333333 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1094698032 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.684210526 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2105263158 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162137986169 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453807345302 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527535702741 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796662764342 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656311945466 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.