Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People are happier when they give away extra money to charity or a good cause rather than when they spend it on themselves.
People would be happy, in my opinion, if they donated their money to charity. After achieving their basic requirements, people begin to focus on their spiritual pleasure, which includes self-identification and social identity. I'll make my case from these two perspectives.
To begin with, donating money to charity offers you a sense of success. Donating money can benefit others and make you happy. Your money can not only meet your personal needs, but it can also improve the lives of others, demonstrating that you are highly capable. When I was in junior high, my classmates and I staged a little charity sale and gave the proceeds to children in need. Then we got letters from the youngsters who had received assistance. They expressed their heartfelt appreciation to us in the letter and stated that they purchased extra food and books as a result of our funds. My buddies and I were overjoyed that day, and we were proud of ourselves for using our power to aid others. Giving money to charity may make the individuals who are assisted feel good, which makes the alms-giver feel proud and happy. Spending money on yourself may be enjoyable. Buying something you want or spending money on something you want will make you happy. However, the pleasure is fleeting and easily obtained. On the contrary, the sense of success that comes from assisting others lasts a long time and gives you more confidence and happiness.
Furthermore, society strongly values individuals who are prepared to contribute to charity, therefore persons who engage in this conduct might obtain social recognition. desire to spend money to assist others Instead of gratifying your own demands, demonstrates that you are not self-centered. Individuals prefer to build stronger relationships with such people because they feel he would provide a helping hand when they need it, whereas people are more likely to leave a favorable impression on others because they are viewed as kind, just, and empathetic. For example, many celebrities or businesspeople would contribute money in order to improve their public image and create a greater societal influence. The act of contributing will win you accolades from coworkers or friends around you for the ordinary individual. As a result, many around you believe you are a kind and decent person. Donations, from this perspective, may also make people happy. Money cannot buy the satisfaction of being acknowledged and valued. This type of satisfaction is more significant than materialistic bliss.
As a result, I believe that spending more money on charity is more conducive to pleasure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...elf-identification and social identity. Ill make my case from these two perspective...
^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Desire
...onduct might obtain social recognition. desire to spend money to assist others Instead...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, whereas, for example, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15058823529 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.890180009 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548235294118 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8030490851 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.56 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250002166279 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637847592711 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510284213018 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141439515073 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565377247025 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.