fake5
The main purpose of this research is considering affection of finical situation on quality of small firms’ profit. Statistical society includes 463 Tehran stock exchange listed firms, and data sample includes 99 firms, which are selected after screening process during the period of 1388 to 1392. At this study, multi-variable regression with pooled data approach is used. Results indicate that risk of bankruptcy has inverse effect on the quality of accruals, predict of profit and sustainability of profit, but have direct effect on profit’s uniformity. Therefore, it is suggested to investors that pay more
attention to the quality of firm’s report while examining information in financial reporting. Since it is possible that reported profit does not reflect the real profit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ffection of finical situation on quality of small firms' profit. Statistical...
^^
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ing information in financial reporting. Since it is possible that reported profit doe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 43.0788530466 16% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 52.1666666667 42% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 679.0 1977.66487455 34% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 120.0 407.700716846 29% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65833333333 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.30975091965 4.48103885553 74% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99182915065 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 212.727598566 41% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.733333333333 0.524837075471 140% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 618.680645161 34% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.6003584229 29% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7383865041 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.166666667 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.53405017921 44% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 10.9000537634 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.94 8.01818996416 136% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.