fewer cars in the future
Since cars were invented and developed, their number has increased vertically in most countries. Some people believe that tendency will continue because vehicles are part of fancy stile lives and high-status images. However, I'm afraid I have to disagree because cars will decrease in the following years for two reasons; first, people are more concerned about the environment, and second, the cost of living has increased.
Environmental care is one of the most important issues that people and institutions take in attention in the last years. Reducing forest trees, increasing greenhouse gas, and growing up pollution are some of the biggest problems. Vehicles are part of one of these groups, and people will definitely have fewer cars to reduce the planet contamination in the future. For example, some countries are improving their system transportation, encouraging people to use them for commuting. One demonstration of this new system is in Europe. More specifically, Spain has changed their old buses for new electrics buses that are not only less contaminant but also are faster.
The cost of living has increased around the world since items have grown up as well. Furthermore, people have had to work more hours or find a second job, but sometimes it is not enough to cover the monthly family budget. Expenses such as rent, services, and car care are so expensive that families will have to reduce some items or services for reducing the amount of money at the end of the month. One of those expensive items is cars. Reducing the number of cars for each family, not only can we reduce environmental pollution, but also make more efficient budgets.
In conclusion, one of our standard life is having the last beautiful and fancy car. Nevertheless, I believe this kind of standard life will change for better standards because people want to take care of the environment, and the family budget is too expensive to continue with this style of living.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
... lives and high-status images. However, Im afraid I have to disagree because cars ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06461538462 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74722194268 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535384615385 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9996259959 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.875 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10410736218 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372901650446 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550444385401 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654831218016 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132368757727 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.