fewer cars in the future
Since the time that cars were invented, their numbers have been consistently increasing in most countries around the world. Some people believe that this trend will continue because of the convenience they offer and the social status that they provide. However, I am convinced that the use of cars will decrease in the coming years for two main reasons.
Most importantly, the use of cars is bound to decrease in response to environmental concerns. Vehicle emissions are major causes of increased greenhouse gas and environmental pollution. Photographs of major cities of the world like Beijing, Mexico City, and Los Angeles, demonstrate the negative effects of the car culture. Some countries are encouraging their citizens to use public transportation to address this problem. For example, Spain has upgraded its old buses with electric buses, which provide not only a faster but cleaner mode of transportation. Other countries are following the same path to reduce the number of cars on the road.
In addition to environmental concerns, the rising cost of living is another factor that will result in reduced numbers of cars on the road. People today have to work more hours or find a second job in order to cover the monthly family budget. Buying and maintaining a vehicle is expensive. Even the price of a used car can be too much for a family. Car ownership brings expenses beyond the purchase price. Cars require registration, insurance, fuel, and upkeep. Considering the cost of living, many families will be forced to have only one car or to rely on public transportation.
In short, I anticipate seeing fewer cars being used because of concerns for the environment and for the family budget. I expect that innovative ideas in public transportation will be put into place in the coming years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, so, for example, in addition, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 298.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05704697987 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85593339726 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587248322148 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8568732853 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.7222222222 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5555555556 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211290251859 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665645890358 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578114500317 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125546133721 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286808435837 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.