Government should provide the poor and the homeless with houses

Essay topics:

Government should provide the poor and the homeless with houses.

The country cannot make any development until the number of people who live under poverty is reduced. Providing houses make benefit for whole countries development. Yes, I gree with the statement that government should provide the poor and the homeless with houses because of following reasons.

Firstly, poor and homeless are the citizen of country so they have right to have a houses. Also, providing houses to poor or homeless can improve their life. They will more encourage by the government's step and will start something that help them to live better. For example, in my country India, there are lots of poor and homeless people. They live in small hurt or side roads. As there are no facilities of bathroom for them, they have to go in anywhere. So government has made some bold decisions and gives every poor and homeless family a house to live. So it also helps government for cleanliness as well as it also beneficial for poor as they can do small business and earn money.

In addition, providing houses also brings safety for poor and homeless people. Sometimes they sleep on roads and many accidents happen because of that. Sleeping on roads or sideways of roads is also dangerous. For example, few months ago, one man who was full drunk as he cannot walk properly killed five peoples who sleep on sideways of roads. So sometimes it is harmful for them and safety of them is also important factor. And they cannot buy any houses as they cannot earn money that they buy houses. So providing houses is also beneficial for them. Thus, government should provide houses to poor and homeless family.

Moreover, any country whose 25% populations are below poverty line can never become developed country. If government more focuses on poor, homeless people who cannot buy houses or unemployed, then country can never become developed. So providing houses is a better step. And if government provide houses with jobs for family, then can achieve same as everyone. Thus, for every developing country, providing houses to poor and homeless is better step.

In conclusion, in every case there are lots of benefit of providing houses for poor and homeless. As we discussed, providing houses will bring safety, encourage to do better, small business and cleanliness. So, government should provide the poor and homeless with houses for above benefits.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (23 votes)
Essay Categories
This essay topic by users:
Post date Users Rates Content
2019-11-09 musakhan 80 Read full essay
2019-10-15 snake 45 Read full essay
2018-08-06 dshah6611 83 Read full essay
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...Providing houses make benefit for whole countries development. Yes, I gree with the state...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a house' or simply 'houses'?
Suggestion: a house; houses
...n of country so they have right to have a houses. Also, providing houses to poor or home...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 162, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...ing houses will bring safety, encourage to do better, small business and cleanliness....
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99746835443 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49539360914 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445569620253 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.00844012 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.1111111111 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6296296296 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.03703703704 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 3.85842293907 441% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392691590553 0.236089414692 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141520746561 0.076458572812 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156622428901 0.0737576698707 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280519874908 0.150856017488 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676280311823 0.0645574589148 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.