How do movies or television influence people’s behavior?
Determining what drives human being and its behavior has been a major concern for the last century. However, at this time, there is not consensus on how technology could shape our behavior. Even though many would argue that television or movies have little impact in people behavior, I think that television has a huge impact in shaping peoples characters, due to cultural, sociological and psychological reasons.
First of all, Cultural Issues. Despite having satellite TV, cable TV or Neftlix, the cultural programs are in retrieve. Moreover, in these days people are not watching any culture on TV they prefer programs such as realities or series. This is a big change in people behavior, in other words, people do not enjoy watching ballet, Opera or science program, and this change is in my opinion a consequence due to new programs on TV. For example, my kids used to love watch NatGeo Wild programs, but ones I got Netflix they only want to see cartoons.
Secondly, the amount of time dedicated to watch TV or movies is becoming excessive and its natural consequence is a change in the way we socialize. Is a sad true that these days’ people do not have long conversation with others because they are captured by TV shows. Keeping in this train of thinking, I think that because of TV people are suffering an impairment of its relationship
Finally, but the more important, psychological changes. I remember when I was a child, my parents always told me: TV shows an imaginary world. Nowadays, kids are confused by realities shows which claim to have “real life “ on TV, moreover they think that perfection is a must, furthermore, they have suffer changes in their behavior due to frustration of not having the perfect bodies , smiles or clothes that TV shows. For example, when my daughter sow her first reality, called “my sweet 15” She experimented anxiety and frustration because she wanted to have the same kind of parties, which she thought it was the “normal “life of everybody.
In summary, on the one hand, TV and technology have the power to improve people’s life but on the other hand, it has consequences in people’s behavior that should be considered and analyzed. Moreover, no matter the type of TV, we must keep in mind that watching TV is shaping people’s behavior through cultural, sociological and psychological ways
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at this time, there is not consensus on how technology could shape our behavior....
^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fering an impairment of its relationship Finally, but the more important, psychol...
^^^
Line 4, column 311, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'suffered'.
Suggestion: suffered
...ction is a must, furthermore, they have suffer changes in their behavior due to frustr...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 395, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tration of not having the perfect bodies , smiles or clothes that TV shows. For ex...
^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ral, sociological and psychological ways
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in summary, kind of, such as, first of all, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02261306533 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89494840226 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550251256281 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8254972921 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.9375 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0625 5.45110844103 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28256563587 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872423153988 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742093670826 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166523450055 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662102377424 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.