Some people say that once a secure job is offered to any job seeker, it is more appealing than a position which provides a higher level of satisfaction. However, given the fact that generations nowadays prioritize the realization of self-worth when hunting for job opportunities and most of them aim at notable status and high income, I believe the majority of the workforce are still inclined to take up something more satisfactory.
Undoubtedly, a secure job seems to be quite attractive to many because the job market has been intensely competitive. Even though one is hired after many rounds of competition and elimination, it doesn’t necessarily mean that he or she wouldn’t be fired in the future. In other words, a person won’t feel worried about job security because a secure job significantly reduces the possibility of unemployment. Besides, for those who enjoy a laid-back lifestyle, only with a stable job can they maintain a better work-life balance because distribution of a large proportion of time to work isn’t necessary for them. As a result, individuals can spend way more quality time with their family and friends.
However, many young people intend to choose a profession which really matches up with their interests and ambition. For example, only a small amount of my peers in high school made up their mind to become employees of state-run industries while the rest of them were eager to work for promising firms in the private sector such as Huawei, Tencent and other giants. Young elite people thirst for positions like artificial intelligence researcher, actuary, top executive and so on. It’s obvious that secure jobs just accounts for a very low percentage of all available ones, thus failing to satisfy ambitious people because they cannot make the best of their talents and passions.
Apart from the pursuit of psychological needs, people today are apparently very realistic and materialistic. Almost everyone wants to live a better life and embrace a decent standard of living, which is reasonable and understandable. To order to compete and win, modern private companies value the talent the most, providing them rich rewards and glamorous jobs. Secure jobs are not comparable at all in terms of what can be guaranteed from them. In reality, most people, especially the well-skilled, wouldn’t condescend to put up with a mediocre and stable job if they could be qualified for a well-paid and highly respected one.
In conclusion, few would consider a secure job as their first choice because the rewards are of only average standard. People attempting to achieve a more successful career must have figured out another way to make it happen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'competing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'order' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: competing
...reasonable and understandable. To order to compete and win, modern private companies value...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, first, however, if, really, so, still, thus, well, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2260.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14806378132 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9013902691 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603644646925 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4212527644 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.555555556 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3888888889 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334586493962 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09548845027 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692602546846 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181832789627 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432514252134 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.