If you could travel back in time to meet a famous person from history, what person would you like to meet? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.
I would prefer to meet Peter the Great If I were able to move in time. I feel this way for his achievements as a leader coupled with his personality.
To begin with, Peter is a legendary figure in Russian history. His achievements are countless, and one of them is opening Russia to Europe. By this I mean, that communication between Russia and Europa appeared at the time of his leadership. For instance, Peter invited researches from Europe into Russia, that allowed developing science and education in Russia. Moreover, he paid a lot of attention to social changes. First, Peter the Great adopted French tradition to organize dances instead of feasts. Second, beards and traditional costumes were prohibited in order to make Russian aristocracy looked like the Europeans. Last but not least, Peter turned Tsardom of Russia in an empire that became one a major power in Europe of his time. He did it by winning the Great Northen War with Carl XII of Sweden. Besides all of the positive influence on Russia, historians find his figure controversial, for he did make a preference to foreign traditions too much and ruled out the local customs.
What is more, it is significant to point out that Petr had exclusive personal traits that attract me. His diversity from previous Tsar of Russia was visible and reflected in his attitude to physical work. He did not find it unrespectable for aristocracy, and, probably, Peter was the only leader of Russia who constructed ships with ordinary people on a shipyard. So he did any work despite its kind. In addition, Peter had never stopped learning that made him a very educated person. The way how he was learning is also interesting. For example, to get a job on European shipyards, he pretended an ordinary worker. To get a high education, he attended classes of European universities as a son a Russian aristocrat, not as a King of Russia. As a result, his contemporaries noticed that Peter was intelligent and able to discuss any theme.
To summarize, Personality characteristics of Peter the Great and his significant impact on Tsardom of Russia makes me thinks that his figure is the best to meet if I were able to travel in the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 818, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...en War with Carl XII of Sweden. Besides all of the positive influence on Russia, historian...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...structed ships with ordinary people on a shipyard. So he did any work despite its...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, for example, for instance, i feel, i mean, in addition, as a result, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83510638298 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88495555214 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547872340426 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3134669786 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6363636364 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0909090909 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31818181818 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0801125977142 0.236089414692 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0259492844884 0.076458572812 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039621718571 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693393076994 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308156926098 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.