Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
The main purpose of the teachers is to teach students as much as possible, so some people think that teacher’s salary should depend on performance of their purples. However, I feel otherwise since this approach not necessary lead to increase of education level.
To begin with, one may think that if a teacher's income is determined by knowledge of students, it will force teacher to teach better. I believe that this notion is wrong, for professors may start to punish children or be more strict to motivate students. Both of these are examples of external motivation. However, external motivation is significantly less effective than internal motivation. By the internal motivation I mean attempts to interest students in studying subject. Unfortunately, most of the teachers find the way of punishments easier than other, so the consequence of the approach suggested in the topic may be a decrease of student's performance; because classes can become less interesting for purples.
What is more, well knowing of a subject is not always an achievement of a teacher. It is important to understand that all teachers deal with different students. Some of the purples are talented and highly motivated, whereas others do not. This diversity of students will necessarily reflect on the knowledge of students. As a result, the better teacher who has a worse result because of having weaker children may get lower pay than a teacher who did almost nothing yet have strong students. By this I mean that we cannot put whole responsibility for education process on teachers. Cleary, the performance of students is highly impacted by professors still is not determined by them only.
To summarize, I am sure that teachers do not have to be paid according to the amount of knowledge that students have, for that teachers do not determine the performance of students and negative aspects that will be observed in case of applying the system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... To begin with, one may think that if a teachers income is determined by knowledge of st...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... teachers deal with different students. Some of the purples are talented and highly motivat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, well, whereas, i feel, i mean, as a result, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 318.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11635220126 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95316506363 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544025157233 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7935103948 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6875 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184869599334 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555759535375 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545149128094 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128165177024 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481893611907 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.