Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Should students be monetary support by governments, if they are not able to pay for their education? If yes, all the students should be or only some part of them? Some would argue that everyone should have the ability to get high education and governments should provide this help because broad access to education helps to create more specialists that may benefit society to develop. Nonetheless, other would state that the supporting of education can lead to decrease the importance of education. This devaluation will affect the quality of graduate students that preclude the society from developing. I believe that only a part of students, who are not able to pay for education should be supported by governments. The selection of students has to be made in accord with the necessity of the program to society.
To begin with, some may say that every student that attended University deserve to be supported by governments since humanity needs people with high education to move forward. These educational people who are base of science and managing are coming from Universities so if we limit opportunities to get an education for poor students we will lose a lot of people who were able to help in social development. However, not all programs are equally important for the society, and if everyone gets support, the misbalance in graduates will be observed. By that I mean, that the educational system without government support to needy students balances itself. If a profession distincts less number of people start to choose the program that connected with this profession because they do not want to be undemanded employees after graduation. If all students get monetary support from governments, they may choose the unpopular program despite its unpopularity and uselessness. It happens because the requirements are often lower for unpopular programs and students may select it is an extream case. In other words, having any theise is better than being without high education at all. This process can be observed in Russia, where all high education is free, so we can say that any attend student gets governments’ support. The result of this approach is a lot of students who attend universities only in order to have some high education, not because they have a passion for it. This wide availability of education in Russia decreases the importance of education. Furthermore, the distribution of students through the programs is still the same each year that makes the educational system inflexible. As a result, a lot of people cannot find a job since the number of majors is larger than some workplaces with that major. Unemployed people are a social problem that can become worse because of the topic’s policy. Thus, both students and society suffer from the consequences of the policy.
What is more, supporting a part of students whose majors are essential for the social development is necessary. I feel this way since talented people are through the both poor and the rich. If governments would not support the poor in crucial programs for society that will definitely affect the quality of graduates. Who know, we would lose the second Mozart or Tesla, if we do not support students who are not able to pay for education. For instance, Pierre-Simon de Laplace who was French mathematician could not afford his education in high school. The monetary support of government played a crucial role in his education and allowed him to become the renowned scientists. Laplace contributed to math, physics, and astronomy. He was one of creators of the probability theory.
Ultimately, after discussing both sides of the issue, it must be concluded that governments should offer free education for some students. Whose shows exceptional talents or who have majors those are needed for society developing.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, still, thus, as to, for instance, i feel, i mean, as a result, in other words, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.3162921348 239% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3209.0 2235.4752809 144% => OK
No of words: 627.0 442.535393258 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11802232855 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00399520894 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8770303055 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433811802233 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1020.6 704.065955056 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3959539086 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.28125 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.59375 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21875 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200277560521 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579450920548 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456028408299 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147626889381 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163904860953 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.