If you need to finish a project with someone at school or at work, which of the following quality is the most important in the partnership. 1.Bing cooperative 2.Being able to meet a deadline 3.Being creative
In modern life, every people need to finish projects effectively and efficiently in rather school or work. Therefore, it is crucial for them to have a good partner. Some people may say that good partners mean they can be able to meet a deadline or being creative, while others indicate that good partners need to be cooperative. In my opinion, I prefer the latter choice.
To begin with, students can improve their communication skills when they have cooperative partners. When students are being cooperative, they can have more discussions during the class, because they will be more likely to listen to others thoughts and ideas. By doing this, students will have more chance to speak about their thoughts. For example, when I was in high school, we often need to deal with many projects, such as astronomy or biology. Fortunately, all of my partners are cooperative, so we often listen to each others ideas. We will start with brainstorming and than think about some more specific detail and finally working on slides. During each of the process, every member in the group need to present their ideas. Therefore, we can learn about how to clearly describe our points and help others totally understand our point of view. So, our communication skills improve a lot. As a result, when people are being cooperative, they will be more patient and listen to others, so others can have the opportunity to learn how to speak. Indeed, it is crucial for people to have a partner that is cooperative.
In addition, if people are being cooperative in a group, it can be more efficient for them to finish their projects. To be more specific, when people are being cooperative in a group, the leader can assign different part of the project to different person, so they can save lots of time. And since they are cooperative, they will not argue with each others. For instance, my brother has a group that everyone is cooperative. One time, they are working about a project about the causes of dinosaurs extinction. There are many causes, so my brother assign a few people to work on one cause, and other people work on the second cause. After each group finish discussing, they can put all the information together and the project is complete. On the other hand, if they are not cooperative, they might argue with each others about the causes they want to research on, and it can cause lots of disorientation. Therefore, it is a waste of time. As a result, when a group is cooperative, they will follow the plan and work on project efficiently, so I think it is better for a group to be cooperative.
Undoubtedly, some people may say that it is more important to be able to meet a deadline or being creative in a partnership when they are asked to finish a project. However, I think that cooperative is the most essential personality, because if partners do not have a good cooperation, how can they be successful when they are working with each others. Indeed, being cooperative, instead of being able to meet a deadline or being creative, is the personality that partners should have.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: AND_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...s. We will start with brainstorming and than think about some more specific detail a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 41.0 15.1003584229 272% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 9.8082437276 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2551.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 535.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76822429907 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74778688769 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.381308411215 0.524837075471 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 797.4 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 13.0 3.51792114695 370% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8121787937 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1071428571 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1071428571 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230434366947 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737623201238 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834056393203 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197014682335 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981771498881 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.