Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
— Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
— Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without any doubt, it is possible for anyone to say somthing wrong, either teachers or speakers in a meeting. But, they way that their audiences would correct them is truly important and could affect the rest of lecture's flow and result. As far as I'm concerned, the best way could be that someone who wants to notice the incorrect piont, wait until the finishing of the class or meeting.
To beging with, by interrupting the lecturers, they might be distracted from what they are talking and the main point they want to mention in the rest of their lecture or speaking. In this way, the other audiences will deprive from a great and effective lecture. Moreover, it could bother the person who stands in front of a group of people as a speaker, and feel ashamed. Therefore, it would be the best choice to wait until the class or meeting is finished and then point out the notice. For instance, when I was defending my Master thesis, a friend of mine jumped over my speaking and asked a silly question. I certainly felt embarracement and I was distracted what I want to say about. He should wait until my lecture was over then asked any question he had.
Furthermore, if you find some mistake in the middle of a talk, it would not a smart decision to say nothing because other may gain incorrect information. Consider a math class as an example, in the case of some incorrect point made by the teacher, if no one correct the instructor, it is possible that students learn a wrong fact and it has negative effect on their learning process. Hence, after the class students should correct their teacher to avoid misleading.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the most clever and the best alternative for saying about an incorrect peice of information mentioned in a lecture or classroom, is that correct the instructor or lecturer only after the class or meeting is over. Due to the avoiding any interruption and misconception made by other audiences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
... of lectures flow and result. As far as Im concerned, the best way could be that s...
^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rect the instructor, it is possible that students learn a wrong fact and it has n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69387755102 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64909837635 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533527696793 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0884377452 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225139645841 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687474181271 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637290723714 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139071599325 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381343394485 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.