Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting says something incorrect in your opinion, which of the following is best thing to do?
1-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
2-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
3-Say nothing.
There is no doubt that nowadays, conversation and speaking about issues and difficulties arise in between people is more effective and influential in daily life. A controversial question which often raises how to confront and behavior in a meeting or someone says your opinion is false. Some people have the viewpoint and believe that we must get a quick reaction and correct the mistake, or some people have opposite idea for this situation to be none reaction to this statement. However, my opinion, after meeting and talk the teacher, I firmly subscribe to this idea, the reasons I think so are manifold, which will be discussed widely hereunder.
Everyone has some personality and popularity in between people, when someone says their wrong attribute in the society that works can hurt their popularity among of people. Hence, although someone recognizes a problem in his or her state in a meeting, can be roughly and slightly patient and wait until all of the people are gone form class. After this, he or she can speak very conveniently without any fear to harm his or her teacher's honor in between people. Typically, everyone acts accordingly to indicate his or her decent treatment as a gentle person.
Secondly, in every problem have being arisen in very differential side way also everyone can in the conversation maybe have a state and express that opposite the each other. In this situation, after class, everyone can discuss with the teacher and even inform he or she of his or her fault. Furthermore, the teacher not only indicates my mistake, but also shows a convenient and expediency path for this situation, which can help me to solve my mistake. In this result, this method easily provides road to everyone can more receptive any criticize and compliant with each other.
The last but not least reason is that everyone needs the best context to defend his or her rights in the calm place and the best time that can provide after meeting without everyone in this place. On the other hand, if one person wants to interrupt the teacher speaking, this busy situation can distract their conversation, and his or her idea is overlooked from the teacher. Finally, the idea whether correct or not, suppressing with a disaster and very noisy place.
To wrap it up, it is my profound belief every wrong opinion against everyone’s notion can be solved with a patient, a decent conversation and a calm and suitable place to talk each other. All in all, everyone is free to every act; however, my opinion, wisely and sophisticatedly an act compatible this way
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...hly and slightly patient and wait until all of the people are gone form class. After this,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 14, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'not the least'.
Suggestion: not the least
...ompliant with each other. The last but not least reason is that everyone needs the best ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...phisticatedly an act compatible this way
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, i think, no doubt, speaking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 33.0 13.8261648746 239% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2144.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9061784897 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6874050686 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514874141876 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.7760792487 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.117647059 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7058823529 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124148568605 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455263155995 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491362176971 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726221056426 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406828377049 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.