Imagine that you are planning to take a vacation and are trying to decide between two places to visit Which of these two options do you believe would give you better information about making your choice Why Reading about the places online Discussing them

Essay topics:

Imagine that you are planning to take a vacation and are trying to decide between two places to visit. Which of these two options do you believe would give you better information about making your choice? Why? ۱٫ Reading about the places online
۲٫ Discussing them with someone you know who has visited both places

In the modern-day, a trip plays a prominent role in all societies. Owing to its paramount importance, a large number of scientists have always been searching for ways to enhance the pleasure of journeys. The issue of whether or not people gain information about their destination from online websites or ask individuals who visited a place has provoked controversy among human beings. I assert that using the internet and online websites for obtaining enough information is the beneficial way. In what follows, the most clear-cut reasons will be discussed.

The first argumentative factor to take into account is that online websites have a variety of outstanding information. To elaborate on this point, since people want to gain data about their destination, they would search on the internet by only keywords. In this situation, a lot of pages are available for reading and achieve adequate information. Furthermore, the websites not only do have essays about places but also have pictures and videos that show all aspects of the place. For example, if someone wants to travel to Isfahan, they can only search Isfahan on the internet. Hence, a lot of information about sightseeing places like Alighabo, Naghshe Jahan, Sisepole, and many other places are shown so that they would better decision about which place is worthwhile to see. Also, in the online information, tourists attain extra data about places such as opening and closing times, and how much time they need to visit. Hence, one is able to schedule and save time for visiting more places. However, people who visited a city, only have information about some places which they were going to see them, so their date is limited.

Another equally significant point is that information on the internet is unbiased. To shed more light on this matter, most online pages show all aspects of the merits and demerits of a city. In this situation, individuals would better decide about their tips. Consider people who want to see the Kerman, for instance. If they search on the internet for gaining information, they would understand that Kerman has a specific garden is Bagh Sahzde. They can visit it during the day; nevertheless, this place does not have any restaurants or coffee shops for eating food or drinking coffee. In this situation, they can timetable for visiting a garden that is not conflicted by dinner time.

Taking all the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I personally believe that gaining information from the internet has several positive points for individuals. This idea is as a result of these two matters that searching from the internet not only do have various information but also support all aspects of information.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ies. Owing to its paramount importance, a large number of scientists have always been searching f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... the pleasure of journeys. The issue of whether or not people gain information about their des...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2280.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11210762332 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74519317788 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508968609865 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9770423438 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1304347826 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3913043478 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20258347198 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606857334634 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604137431308 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122228427901 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553053705751 0.0645574589148 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ies. Owing to its paramount importance, a large number of scientists have always been searching f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... the pleasure of journeys. The issue of whether or not people gain information about their des...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2280.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11210762332 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74519317788 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508968609865 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9770423438 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1304347826 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3913043478 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20258347198 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606857334634 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604137431308 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122228427901 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553053705751 0.0645574589148 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.