Imagine that you are planning to take a vacation, trying to decide between two places to visit. Which of these two options do you believe would give you better information about making your choice? Why?
-- Reading about the places online
--Discussing the places with someone you know who has visited both
I prefer to read about the places online. Discussing with friends who has been visited there might be a good choice, but it is kind of insufficient comparing to the first choice.
First of all, with rapid development of society and technology, internet become more and more powerful. With internet, you can get everything you want about the two places either form foods to landscape or from tour route to security . And there are so many former experience about these two places form different people you could refer to. With different views and sufficient experience, you are more easier to make your own choice which is suitable for yourself.
Many people, especially from the elder generation, hold the opinion that it is more dependable to communicate with someone you are familiar with about the place you are planning to go. They believe that if you gained information from someone you know in the real world, then the information would be indeed reliable. However, from my personal experience, this could not be true. Since people of various background and experience may have different feelings about a same thing, the feelings of others may be totally different from mine, sometimes even on the contrary. For example, some people with adventitious spirit may take an unstationary trip as an enjoyment, while for someone it might be a disaster. For me, following a perfect traveling plan would be a pleasure. This problem can be much serious when it comes to really personal things like food.
It is not to say that advice about traveling place from friends have no meaning. If the person you are asking is very familiar with you and you two have so much in common, then, it will be a wonderful choice to take the advice of him or her. However that situation is not always the case, the perfect adviser could not satisfy the condition all the time.
According to the statement above, I will go to internet for advice rather than to discuss the places with someone I know has visited both.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ficient comparing to the first choice. First of all, with rapid development of ...
^^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...landscape or from tour route to security . And there are so many former experience...
^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun experience seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much former experience', 'a good deal of former experience'.
Suggestion: much former experience; a good deal of former experience
...ur route to security . And there are so many former experience about these two places form different p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...iews and sufficient experience, you are more easier to make your own choice which is suitab...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...choice which is suitable for yourself. Many people, especially from the elder g...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to really personal things like food. It is not to say that advice about trave...
^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...hoice to take the advice of him or her. However that situation is not always the case, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t satisfy the condition all the time. According to the statement above, I will...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, really, so, then, while, for example, kind of, you know, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80459770115 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5505231358 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6943200172 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3529411765 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309369521456 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105064151055 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934849053464 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172158650716 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070782982443 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.