To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is a wide range of debate whether it is better to spend money on salaries university professor or other things in order to improve the quality of education. In my opinion, the benefits of spending money on university facilities clearly outweigh the salaries of professors. I fill this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the ensuing paragraphs.
First of all, if university spends money on t facilities, they are able to increase students' knowledge and expand their horizon easily. In fact, they can consume their money on buying new books, changing old computers, providing new equipment for laboratories, all of which enable students to become knowledgeable and skillful. In addition, an advanced laboratory provides an opportunity for students to put their knowledge into practice and enable them to become successful in their future. An example will illustrate this viewpoint much better. when I was an undergraduate student, our university decided to buy new equipment for all university laboratories. Since our laboratory had sophisticated equipment, I was strongly eager to take some courses related to the laboratory. Subsequently, it helped me to touch real world by doing several experiments. Then, because of having a lot of various valuable experience in doing experiments, I could find a decent job easily. For this reason, facilities of university allow students to become prosperous in both education and job.
Secondly, spending money on some facilities such as renovating university cafe, club, and so forth boost students’ skills socially. As a matter of fact, they are able to make friends and become familiar with various students with a different attitude, which help to interact better with their co-workers in the future. For example, when I was an undergraduate student, I had a part-time job at university campus magazine as a reporter. As I remember, one time, I interviewed professor Nejati, who is a well-known psychologist in my country, about the effects of promoting social skill in students. He told me that based on his expertise and experience a high percentage of students who were a sociable person, would not have serious problems in their work environment. Also, he told me that they progress easily in order to be a sociable person. As a result, if university consumes money on recreation places, students can promote their lives socially.
In conclusion, no one can deny the enormous positive effects of spending money on universities’ facilities. Not only are they able to promote students information and knowledge, but also they provide them a situation which makes them sociable person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'salaries'' or 'salary's'?
Suggestion: salaries'; salary's
... whether it is better to spend money on salaries university professor or other things in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 548, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
... illustrate this viewpoint much better. when I was an undergraduate student, our uni...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28235294118 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11827829348 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545882352941 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2420059213 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.904761905 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2380952381 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38095238095 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200451366974 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699128557746 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892899646317 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150015327941 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961119659116 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.