Without any doubt, a good leader plays a crucial role in any organization's success and prosperity in the long-term. The debate on whether or not leadership can be learned has been a controversial issue for a long time. While many people posit that leadership is an intrinsic characteristic and cannot be developed externally by everyone, I would argue that talent is highly overrated in this regard and one can be a great leader by putting effort and time into learning all aspects of leadership. I will be justifying my stance in more detail hereunder.
To begin with, leadership is a skill that people can learn by practicing. Moreover, leadership itself consists of many features, among which team playing, showing up, caring, positive attitude, and doing the right things are some of the most noticeable ones, in my opinion. These characteristics virtually require no talent or distinct ability. To be more specific, based on the aforementioned characteristics, a good leader is someone who is present mentally and physically, actively contributes to the group, keeps the team informed, listens to them carefully, and has a positive outlook and high level of energy. Undoubtedly, many other aspects can be added to the above list, all of which require a great desire and determination rather than talent.
Secondly, many people consider leadership and being a great leader as a destination. However, based on a famous relevant book, which name eludes me at the moment, leadership is a continuum. By understanding this concept, great leaders would emerge, and they continue to refine, develop, and build the process by making effort consistently. Therefore, without any leadership talent, by putting a lot of effort and persistence, and by understanding some basic notions, all people potentially can become great leaders. Although it is clear that some people are doing better in this process and learning some aspects faster, the effect of striving and desire substantially outweigh the talent.
Thus, with all this taken into account, talent should not be an obstacle to halt people from trying to reach their goal of becoming a great leader. Like the other skills, leadership can be achieved by making enough attempts and paying attention to some important details and features of the leading process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organizations'' or 'organization's'?
Suggestion: organizations'; organization's
...good leader plays a crucial role in any organizations success and prosperity in the long-term...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...sperity in the long-term. The debate on whether or not leadership can be learned has been a co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22043010753 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97809185585 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561827956989 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6168953581 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.375 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149221977738 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553459373408 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040942231958 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101054755143 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303504439309 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.