I utterly disagree with the statement. However, some strongly defend this point of view that children should continue their parent’s footsteps and their prosperity is depended whether they listen to their elder’s experiences. I, to some states, agree with them but, choosing a career just because of parents in my opinion is absurd. Regarding the diversities in personalities, the constant change in society in our era and at the end alternation of the demands in goods and services, I believe that deciding a major and field to start working on should be about what an individual wants not about their family history.
I believe we can all agree to the idea that the generations that are being born now, born in past and will be born in future are very different in every way. The constant and hasten developments of technology has brought lots of facilities and other convenience to our lives. Although, nowadays we live in rush and deal with lots of pressure in our work environments but the jobs and the things we do are very different than what our parents did. The highly competitive environment of these days has made this generation to continue moving forward using newer methods and innovations in producing, advertising and marketing. Therefore, experiences of our parents and their tips in how they did their jobs won't work much for us. As a consequence, it is better to choose an occupation that we are able to handle and flourish in it.
The diversity in personalities are absolutely vivid and obvious even inside a family with kids in same age. Though, perseverance, education and the advocate of family is important in someone’s skills being thrived but the inner talents and interest of a person is completely special and virtually unlikely to change. Hence, it is possible that kids won't like their parent’s jobs which happens frequently and even if they did they wouldn't have the adequate skill to handle the job as well as them. For instance, my mother is an accountant but my sister hates math and is nowhere near being talented on it. For that reason, thinking of becoming an accountant in future is like pure nightmare for her.
Following the cultural changes in society and as a result the generations, people choose very different hobbies and have many different demands for their lives. Accordingly, the jobs that used to be profitable in past now are in depression. For example, our parents all used to pay for a photographer to take their pictures on Christmas, Easter or other celebrations and print it for them but nowadays with the extension of the smart phones and cameras people mostly shoot for themselves and only limited people with limited jobs pay for professional photographers. In order to that, it is understandable why kids should choose majors other than their parents.
Consequently, choosing a job should be based upon the contemporary demands in the market and the jobs that are more likely and are potential to make progress instead of the jobs that were in prestige in past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 420, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...and the things we do are very different than what our parents did. The highly compet...
^^^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ns frequently and even if they did they wouldnt have the adequate skill to handle the j...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 122, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... choose very different hobbies and have many different demands for their lives. Accordingly, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...stead of the jobs that were in prestige in past.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, hence, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 13.8261648746 231% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2536.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 512.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.953125 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87491242649 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509765625 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 794.7 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.1974710521 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.8 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411765853116 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107114332791 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855481297793 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221891124399 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037193869439 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.