Humans are social beings. It is quite unnatural for humans to habitat in secluded environment. Why were societies formed by humans n the past? Simply, for easiness and security. Considering this ancestoral human nature we can assume that the statement presented is true as it would make human life more effective and effecient. Moreover, other reasons to support success follows mostly in team work is posited below.
Considering complexity of present day's technological advancement and infrastrucural development, it is quite easy to state that human task would be more successfully completed when acting as group. Word is moving at a faster pace towards microscopic level and cumbersome scientific accomlishments. If an individual tries to catch this pace only thorugh his strength then it would near to impossible to task. But, if collective efforts are assigned then it is quite easier to catch pace. If we consider present days successful companies, then they are only handful of businessman who are successful through individual efforts. Look at Apple Company, was it established under single leadership? No! Facebook? No! So, in order to gain success in present day's collective team effort is very important.
Team efforts would empower new ideas and innovation in a task. A team consists of varied individuals. These individuals have diversified thought process. These diversified thoughts would harbour new innovation and ideas in a single subject matter. In addition, there will be choices of ideas which will come from these individuals. Among these choices there will be option to select the best one. On the contrary, individual effort would not ensure this option. Let us consider we have a pound of apple. An agriculturist may want to grow new trees from that apple or a businessman may want to sell the apple by making pickles. There is diversified ideas coming from two individuals. After evaluating these ideas we can select the best one. Thus, team effort would be helpful in providing diversified ideas which is more likely to make us successful.
Also, team would would make us more productive nad effecient. There is division of work load among individuals of team which would benifit individuals, eventually. Lower workloads creates less pressure among individuals which give them with more thinking space and makes our task more efficient. For example, it would be wuite impossible to create a vaccine of COVID through individual effort. But, because of collective efforts of individuals from different field of medical sciences we are able to produce the vaccine. Had the task been assigned to single individual, he would never have been able to find the solution.
Therefore, it can be claimed that team work would ensure more success than individual effort. As we are familiar that a stick is quite easier to break than a bunch of sticks, working in team would provide extra sparkle to an individual. It would help us by providing effecient and pressure free working environment. This would ultimately culminate to fruitful success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d cumbersome scientific accomlishments. If an individual tries to catch this pace ...
^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...hese diversified thoughts would harbour new innovation and ideas in a single subject matter. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 683, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...fied ideas coming from two individuals. After evaluating these ideas we can select th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 12, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: would
...kely to make us successful. Also, team would would make us more productive nad effecient. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 9.8082437276 245% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2572.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 492.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22764227642 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86980929799 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502032520325 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 805.5 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.6003584229 170% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6053952604 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.4857142857 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0571428571 20.6045352989 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.97142857143 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187801784094 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049445173362 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686464519644 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121682059158 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805588605938 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.