It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed.
The society that we live in today is highly competitive, and great weight is placed on individual success. Due to this, many people question whether working as a team is better for success than working individually. In my case, I believe that working as a team is the ideal way to succeed for several reasons.
To begin with, by working as a team, it becomes easier to solve problems. Since every person possesses different knowledge and a different perspective on a problem, new insights and unique approaches to problems will come up while working as a team, which will help solve the problem with ease. For example, while developing an application during an internship, I was having trouble simplifying the calculation procedures. I could not find out how to solve the errors I was having due to complex calculations. Despite this, I was hesitating to ask for help because I wanted to accomplish this task on my own. However, just before giving up, I decided to talk to the team leader of the developing team and asked him for help. Surprisingly, he was very open to me asking for help and asked the entire team to help me with the calculations. The outcome was very surprising. The problem that I couldn't solve for weeks by myself was solved within hours.
Moreover, working as a team helps to brainstorm novel ideas. This is also proven by the famous proverb, "Two heads are better than one." Since everyone in the team is from a different background and differing life experiences, diverse ideas can be formed while working in a team than as an individual. Looking back at my previous experiences, there was a time when I participated in a creativity contest in which I had to create a new product that could solve an inconvenience that we face in our daily lives. While doing this project, I could not come up with any problems that had no solutions to them. After pondering over this for several days, I asked a few of my friends for help. Astonishingly, we were able to come up with several problems and creative solutions to them by just conversing with each other and building upon one another's ideas. Since then, I was able to learn that working as a team is indeed better than working alone.
Because of the two reasons above, I ardently assert that working as a team is better than working alone. As the famous basketball player Michael Jordan mentioned, "Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence win championships." Like so, cooperation will bring excellent outcomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-08 | bhaskar1325 | 60 | view |
| 2021-04-16 | SaC | 70 | view |
- These days if you pick up a newspaper or turn on the TV or radio you may hear or read about the advantages of driverless cars also called self driving or autonomous cars The technology is simple to understand using sensors and computers these cars can dri 73
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 60
- It is better for people to choose jobs that come with high salaries even though they do not enjoy doing it than to choose jobs that they enjoy but come with low salaries 73
- It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed 85
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education 50
Comments
If You Also Want To Earn…
If You Also Want To Earn Real Money Through This Ganesha Vip App Then Definitely Read This Article
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 891, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...was very surprising. The problem that I couldnt solve for weeks by myself was solved wi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, while, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84722222222 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88501342616 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6230122694 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7142857143 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95238095238 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341774889165 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107060830879 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121965722524 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230802618182 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894814688092 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.