it could be more important to read or watch news about opposite opinions rather than similar opinions
With the increasing kinds of means for us to express our own opinions, whether we should read or watch news about opposite opinions becomes a hot-button topic on the air. As for me, I believe that it could be more important to read or watch news about opposite opinions rather than similar opinions, because of getting objective prospective and embracing different ideas.
Most importantly, read or watch news about opposite opinions would lead us with an objective prospective. As is common sense, different people may have different perspective even after reading the same book or experiencing the same story. Therefore, our own idea may only show one side of problem in book or story. For example, my cousins Joe and Mark hold different opinions on whether online sharing bicycle should be allowed in the road. Joe, who rides the sharing bicycle every day, believes that online sharing bicycles have brought great convenience to the public, which could save us lots of time during traffic jam. However, Mark, who owns his cars for commute, is disagreed with Joe ideas, because he thinks that sharing bicycles bring the careless parking in the roads, which could be harmful to the view of the city. Although both of them are reasonable to us, they only consider their own side according to their own interest. Therefore, after the discussion, we can get a more general and objective prospective to the problem. On the contrary, if one only force himself to similar opinions, he may foster his subjective opinion again and again.
Additionally, opposite opinions can help us to open our mind to embrace different ideas, because opposite opinions can lead us to a brainstorm and even forming critical thinking in our mind. Thus, we could more easily accept different ideas from others, and then try to think about why others could hold this idea. It could facilitate the communicate between people and increase the stability of society. Just like the discussion about online sharing bicycles, which is not only an argument between my cousin but also a hot topic in China, the administration always held the meeting between sharing bicycle user and non-user to discuss a better way to manage those sharing bicycle operation in Guangzhou. It not only eases the conflict between user and non-user, but also provides a better chance to understand each other.
Admittedly, some opposite opinions may not reasonable enough for us to accept, but our own opinion may have a similar problem we could not find out. According to opposite opinions, we may find out the problems of our own opinions or opposite opinions, which can greatly help us to develop a better idea or prospective for the future.
All in all, it seems to be safe to conclude that reading or watching news about opposite opinions may be more critical than those similar opinions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hot-button topic on the air. As for me, I believe that it could be more importan...
^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...uld hold this idea. It could facilitate the communicate between people and increase the stabili...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a hot topic in China, the administration always held the meeting between sharing ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, as for, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2368.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98526315789 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58356192954 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.0000532708 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.631578947 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396328929377 0.236089414692 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136272891541 0.076458572812 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15939937021 0.0737576698707 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302044657231 0.150856017488 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165319161582 0.0645574589148 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.