It is difficult for teachers to be both popular (well liked) and the effective in helping students to learn.
Teachers are a vital part of every society. Students spend a lot of time in class with different instructors from elementary school to university. Some people believe that instructors can be famous as much as effective in teaching pupils, while others disagree completely. In my perspective, I think that it is not possible for teachers not only to teach effectively but also to be renowned between students for two important reasons which I will elaborate in following paragraphs.
First and foremost, teacher should be serious to take students’ attention thoroughly to increase the efficiency of learning. In young age, individuals are so energetic and they like to play and speak with their friends during the class. Should teachers want to control them to study, they should be serious and cruel which can cause students not to love them. For example, when I was at high school, I had a advanced mathematics course with serious teacher who never smile. During the class, all student was afraid to look around. They spent to much time to learn quickly so that they could pass quiz. Actually, students studied so hard to avoid his hard punishment. After final exams, students decided to kill him as he put them under serious pressure. As you can see, it is not plausible for teacher to be popular and effective instructor at the same time.
Second, for rising efficiency, teachers have to expend all the time of class which cause students not like. Because of limitation of time, teacher use every second and moments to teach, while students will be tired during the class time. As a result, students will be disgust their teacher deeply. For instance, when I was at elementary school, I had a history course which was so hard and extensive. Teacher had to begin to teach right away he arrived the class. In fact, it was so hard for me to concentrate due to the fact that they lost their energy and power. As over time, not only I lost my passion to learn but also I hated him. Hence, I did not spend to much time to follow him during the classes. Unfortunately, I could not pass the exams and I got fired. This experience shows me, teachers can not be will liked when they try to teach in effective way.
In conclusion, there is not any way for teacher to be popular and effective in teaching simultaneously. Not only do teacher have to serious to teach, but they also spend all the time of class to teach. If teachers want to enhance the efficiency of teaching, they should not pay attention to popularity between students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 406, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ample, when I was at high school, I had a advanced mathematics course with seriou...
^
Line 2, column 542, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...t was afraid to look around. They spent to much time to learn quickly so that they...
^^
Line 3, column 660, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...lso I hated him. Hence, I did not spend to much time to follow him during the clas...
^^
Line 3, column 817, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'like' or 'be liked'?
Suggestion: like; be liked
...ence shows me, teachers can not be will liked when they try to teach in effective way...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive in teaching simultaneously. Not only do teacher have to serious to teach, but...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, if, look, second, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7223476298 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60848669231 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471783295711 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3181720945 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4615384615 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0384615385 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19230769231 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305140010029 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949871099828 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768872238248 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217740617998 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133007196628 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.