It goes without saying in this progressive and sophisticated world where we live, a human being has been engaged in various activities and tasks in order to provide the necessities of life. Recently, there has been a hot debate among many people about the very notion that whether accomplishing similar tasks during the workday is more satisfactory for the workers or different types of task in a single working day might be more efficacious for them. As far as I am concerned, I hold the view that working similar errands and tasks can better satisfy workers. The reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, it is no secret to anyone that being engaged in similar tasks will open the doors of expertise to the workers. In other words, when workers in any job and occupation, being a constructional worker, an employee working in an enterprise, a chief, or an assortment of other careers, work an elongated hours during various workdays on a specified task, it will improve his or her experience to a great extent. An example can drive this notion home. For more than five years, i have been working as the chief of a fast food restaurant in which the only served food is a special type of hamburger with a unique, personal recipe of mine. For five years, i have been preparing this special sandwich which put me in a prestigious place and rank among all other fast food centers in my city. In my opinion, the only reason that has led to my success and reputation lies behind the fact that i have gained noticeable experience not only about the food i make, but also about the customers, their tastes and their desires. If i have been doing different activities-making various food to be served in the restaurant, i would not become as successful as i am presently.
Moreover, doing the same activities rather than different types of tasks will have a positive effect on the outcome of the job the workers do. Put it in other words, the more similar task the workers accomplish, the more productive the tasks and the more proficient the workers will be. In this line of thought, not only will the workers benefit from doing similar activities, but also the company they work for will become prosperous. As a result, since doing similar activities and tasks will shed light on the abilities and talents of the worker, they will in turn become more adept and proficient and less amount of time will be spend in order to do the job. As an illustration, my sister works as a translator in a company and from the first day of her job, he assured the manager to be the Persian to English translator not vice versa. Having focused on one task instead of engaging in two or three different ones related to translating, she has mastered her translation ability and she therefore is proficient enough to accomplish a simple task in a limited time. However, her other co-workers who have been struggling and delving themselves into various types of translation, cannot be as productive as my sister is for the company.
In conclusion, having considered the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I do believe that working similar tasks during workday is more beneficial and satisfactory for the workers. Not only will they become expert and gain enough experience in their responsibilities, but also they become proficient and productive for the company they work for.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 957, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...able experience not only about the food i make, but also about the customers, the...
^
Line 1, column 1121, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...us food to be served in the restaurant, i would not become as successful as i am ...
^
Line 1, column 1157, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...nt, i would not become as successful as i am presently. Moreover, doing the same...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2297.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76556016598 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78541709741 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46265560166 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.0723600706 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.5625 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.125 20.6045352989 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122275272199 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497017161111 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311959934955 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0791406361688 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486974605497 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.