It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The question is whether working for long hours only three days a week or working five days a week for shorter hours. Everyone with regard to his private viewpoint may support a specific direction toward this statement. Some people believe that it is better to work for long hours only three days a week. While, others have a conviction that it is better to work shorter hours for five days a week. I am unanimous with the latter group because in my view, working five days a week it is reasonable for all ages to handle that schedule. I will vastly explain my vantage pint through two salient reasons.
To begin with, I would say that it is vital to have an active life which will keep you busy and focused in your life. Majority of people do not know how to spend their time even when they have plenty of it, so, they end up not entertaining themselves either being productive in their duties. If people have already a schedule to follow, they might be more organised and focused without loosing their time by doing either one. The recent research has shown that people who had free time they felt useless by not knowing what to do. Therefore, they wanted to work as much as they could.
Because of this, I think that people should be following a schedule for the week without interruption, So, they can be valuable.
Furthermore, another reason which has to be considered is that working five days a week for shorter hours would keep you healthy, mentally and physically. People that work out everyday are more energetic and mentally sharp. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by University of Toronto has asserted that people who were active every day are more healthier than people who do not work everyday. They suggested that better results we must have when work shorter hours everyday than force our body for three days straight and then rest . To elucidate, take my example. Five years ago I worked for a company only three days but long hours. After couple of months I didn't feel well because my body was not used to resist in those long hours work. Consequently, I was not productive enough at my work. Afterwords, I changed the schedule and because of that I would never look for jobs that has that requirement. That is why, not everybody can handle this schedule physically.
To sum up, I strongly believe that working only three days a week for a long hours it is not suitable for everyone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ly and physically. People that work out everyday are more energetic and mentally sharp. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
...at people who were active every day are more healthier than people who do not work everyday. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 404, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e healthier than people who do not work everyday. They suggested that better results we ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 486, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ts we must have when work shorter hours everyday than force our body for three days stra...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 552, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...dy for three days straight and then rest . To elucidate, take my example. Five yea...
^^
Line 7, column 681, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ut long hours. After couple of months I didnt feel well because my body was not used ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this schedule physically. To sum up, I strongly believe that working only thr...
^^
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'hour'?
Suggestion: hour
...rking only three days a week for a long hours it is not suitable for everyone.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, as to, i think, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64814814815 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42325466406 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493055555556 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2255847992 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3043478261 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7826086957 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47826086957 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474594942686 0.236089414692 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148173251527 0.076458572812 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145450944285 0.0737576698707 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269156952892 0.150856017488 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16532135717 0.0645574589148 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.