Some people believe that three days work for a long time are more relaxing to get more vacation to enjoy personal time and others think just the opposite way. Because a mass of men equals a mass of opinions. The issue is a controversial one, but in my opinion, a closer examination reveals that working for five days a week is more preferable for several reasons. I will explain my position, providing examples to support my point of view.
First of all, consistent workload makes some good output because anyone can get some scope to think, planning and other issues related on that. A quick finishing task never makes a swift output but if it is done with proper planning with the required time, it's quality much better than a quick one. For example, when I was an undergrad student, in the GIS lab, our lab instructor gave us an assignment which should submit the next following day. I planned and divided this work into little piece for the whole week and got a good score. On the other hand, one of my friends finished this task within just one hour with a big hurry for her overconfidence. Consequently, she got a poor mark and did not understand properly the whole process of methodology.
Second, everyone wants time for their personal matter and in my view, I think two days of the weekend are enough to enjoy. Everyone has their own family to spend their time. At the weekend they can go outside, roaming, travelling for refreshment. More weekend makes discontinuity with office work and more desire to get free time which is really unexpected to many nations.
On the contrary, some people have the ability to do multitasks at a time simultaneously. They do not prefer to work with interval. After completing a certain task, they feel relief. They can do work in a relentless way.
In a nutshell, while there are many arguments to be made for both sides, it is clear that constant workload is better for good performance because of all the reasons mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and others think just the opposite way. Because a mass of men equals a mass of opinions...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a relentless way" with adverb for "relentless"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ask, they feel relief. They can do work in a relentless way. In a nutshell, while there are man...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, really, second, so, while, for example, i think, first of all, in my opinion, in my view, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70200573066 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60556624555 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578796561605 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7820205315 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3684210526 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.10526315789 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231591331588 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662634509358 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721172789085 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1229447931 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671418051538 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.