It is more fun to see a movie in the cinema with other people than see a movie at home
Some people contend that watching movie at home would be a better choice for them than in the movie theater. However, I hold the opposite view that I prefer enjoying movies at cinema, as I would be able to immerse into an atmosphere that brings them a totally different experience.
First and foremost, the experience of watching movies in the cinema would be impressive, as its environment is designed particularly for thousands of film funs all around the world. To be more specific, when 3D technology has come out, it was applied into entertainment field, especially for movies. It is no doubt that 3D technology makes environment more real than before, like all the characters and the sceneries happening right in front of your eyes, giving people sense of authenticity and elevating whole film industry to a new level that people would not be able to enjoy only by watching movies on TV or laptops. For instance, I saw a remake of Harry Potter with my friends last summer and it gives a totally different experience, even though I had saw original edition on my laptop for many times. It was the decisive battle that, in the end of the movie, Potter with his powerful wand fought with Lord Voldemort, settling all the grudge between them. Under the influence of sound and virtual effect, such decisive engagement elicited audience's mood and made me emotional. I realized Potter had grown up and showed courage in face of danger, while I did not have such intense feeling at home. In this case, 3D technology and sound effect in the cinema could be useful tools to draw the distance close between movies and audiences.
More importantly, another benefit of watching films with friends is that people get to share the films' plots with strange people, which makes watching movies a more pleasurable social activity. When people are seeing a kind of movie in the cinema, it is possible that audiences there have same emotion as the plot goes up and down. People are more likely to resonate with characters' encounters and have same topic that they are passionate about to share. Go back to the example stated above, a loyal fun of Harry Potter, named Bobby, sat beside me. Because we had same interest and enthusiasm for incredible magic world in Harry Potter, we started communicating with him rapidly, talking from film's plots to origin of such series. After film, I added friend with him on WeChat. Gradually I found, except for Harry Potter, we also had other interests, such as anime and soccer, and I felt fortunate to become friends with him.
In a nutshell, I still remain that people had better to see a film at home, since they would be able to enjoy a realistic atmosphere and get a chance to watch those specifically newly film in the first time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1046, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'audiences'' or 'audience's'?
Suggestion: audiences'; audience's
...fect, such decisive engagement elicited audiences mood and made me emotional. I realized ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, still, then, thus, while, except for, for instance, kind of, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2291.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77291666667 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54438976394 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54375 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.6688725061 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.277777778 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339140382935 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993186339877 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778689703745 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204200302982 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502588954311 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.