It is more important for governments to spend more money in the internet than public transportation.
We are living in a complex age which facilities have a profound impact on one's life. Although some people believe that governments should spend more money on the internet than the public transportation, I firmly concur with the idea that spending money on the public transportation brings citizen more benefit than investing in public transportation. There are some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
First of all, it is undoubted that, people are able to save their time and money if they use public transportation. As a matter of fact, using own car result in people struck in traffic and do not get their destination in time. To illustrate this fact, one needs only refer to the numerous people who their meeting due to spending a great deal of time in the traffic. Although the internet may bring people access the huge volume of sources, what results from investing money in public transportation are to increase the people' chance to use their information in different meeting. For example, the noteworthy intelligible results, which conducted in our country, show that approximately 90% of people who are prosperous in their vacation, are ones who are always on time to get their work. As a result, what I am certain is that people using public transportation are able to save a great deal of money.
The second reason why I agree with it is that, obviously, the main reason of air pollution derived from lack of presence of public transportation. In fact, investing in public transportation can be indispensable factor to limit the air pollution. The modern world offers abundant examples of a lot of today's diseases deriving from air pollution which public transportation can help people to experience healthy life. For example, 10 years ago, there was a time that governments did not enact the law which limited using own car in some time of the day due to that there are a lot of breathing diseases resulting in lack of enacting that law. Had the governments enacted that law, people would not have caught hard diseases. Consequently, were I be a determiner in our country, I would have invested money on public transportation in order to bring people healthy life.
To make a long story short, no one can deny the enormous positive effect of spending money on public transportation. Not only can people save their time and money, but also they will be healthy in their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rld offers abundant examples of a lot of todays diseases deriving from air pollut...
^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to experience healthy life. For example, 10 years ago, there was a time that gove...
^^
Line 3, column 741, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ave caught hard diseases. Consequently, were I be a determiner in our country, I wou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, for example, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8961352657 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90789255466 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463768115942 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6664696566 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.235294118 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3529411765 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2650063807 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857482836041 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129583215356 0.0737576698707 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192625206825 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133565078497 0.0645574589148 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.