it is not as easy as it was in the past to be professional in all areas
Throughout history people have been skilled in different fields and there has not been anyone who was specialized just in one area of knowledge. Nowadays, it is not as easy as it was in the past to be professional in all areas. The vast majority of people are of the opinion that one should have broad knowledge of many academic subjects. I, contrary to the popular belief, contend that people should specialize in one specific area. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most conspicuous reasons and examples.
One of the reasons coming to mind at first is that nowadays every area of knowledge is of a great depth. In other words, each subject which one choses to specialize in, has a great deal of information to be learned and a great quantity of knowledge to be gained. As a result, it is not possible to have knowledge of many academic subjects. One can become professional in just one subject and try to have a shallow understanding in other fields of knowledge as well. As an instance, hardly can somebody who is specialized in biology learn a kind of physics which is practical and of help in his life. Moreover, there are many new discoveries in the field of biology that he has to spend many years of his life to become specialized in the biology. This is true about all other fields of knowledge.
Another equally noteworthy reason supporting my opinion is that people who are specialized in a subject usually have better job opportunities. Since nowadays there are many ways of learning such as internet, documentaries and books, a great number of people have information about different subjects to some degree. As a result what is of the most importance for companies which going to employ new people is the degree of being professional in the specific subject which the company needs. Statistics conducted in my area recently reveals that more than 80 percent of companies do not look for somebody who is familiar with their filed of work but look for somebody who is specialized in their field of work.
The last but not the least point is that a person who has deep understanding in a field of knowledge and is professional in that specific field has more self-confidence that somebody who knowledge of many subjects. The reason is that the professional person can answer any question he is asked about that specific subject and solve any problem he faces. On the contrary, the other person cannot answer all the questions in the fields he has studied because of lack of knowledge. Although he has some degree of knowledge in many subjects but he lacks sufficient knowledge in every subject to solve all problems and answer all questions. As a psychological research discloses, these kind of people do not have enough self-confidence which may lead to depression.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons and examples lead us to the conclusion that it is a better idea to specialize in one specific subject rather than many academic subjects. However, that was a story in a nutshell. Actually, there are a myriad of other reasons and examples which are not mentioned here due to the dearth of time. Finally, it is suggested that a survey be conducted in order to find out which one is more beneficial for the person and the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one chose', 'a chose', or simply 'choses'?
Suggestion: one chose; a chose; choses
...pth. In other words, each subject which one choses to specialize in, has a great deal of i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 640, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'psychological research'.
Suggestion: psychological research
...l problems and answer all questions. As a psychological research discloses, these kind of people do not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 676, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... As a psychological research discloses, these kind of people do not have enough self-confi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 244, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...ry in a nutshell. Actually, there are a myriad of other reasons and examples which are...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, as to, kind of, such as, as a result, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 15.1003584229 232% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 28.0 11.0286738351 254% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 88.0 52.1666666667 169% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2712.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 568.0 407.700716846 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77464788732 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88187981987 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8310625559 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.394366197183 0.524837075471 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 865.8 618.680645161 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4806807674 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.48 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.72 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191838331827 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659099621736 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128932901533 0.0737576698707 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119090261608 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822923363439 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.