knowledge
Knowledge is the one thing, on which we depend to live a life. Without any type of the knowledge, one can not survive in today's modern world. There are two types of people. One group think that they can develop knowledge in one particular area of interest, others think they want knowledge of all topic. I believe that it is good to have the skills and knowledge of as many as possible academic subjects. Having a knowledge of many subjects is very helpful in today's competitive world, as well as in the real world. Discoveries and inventions are based on the correlation between different areas of subjects.
Discoveries and inventions become successful if it considers all aspects of subjects. The invention of medicine requires scientists for knowledge of antibiotics and results of it, chemists for their microbiotic explanations, doctors for checking suitability to the patients. Thus, just find an alternative of medicine or drug or for a new invention for that correlation is required. But all these inventions is done of any single person, so he must have knowledge of biology, medicine and science. Altogether leads to the fact that having knowledge of many academics is important. Moreover, if one has an interest in space science then he also required knowledge of science, astronomy, and geology of the different planet. Correlation is must require of to find new things or any field like space science.
In today's competitive world one have must knowledge of different things and related subjects. For instance, I am a mechanical engineer, and to get a good paying job, I also have to learn a different type of skills. All which correlated to my subjects, like, I have to study mechanical also computer programing, managerial skills, environmental knowledge, and industrial knowledge. So, knowledge of many fields requires to compete with others and get a good job. Furthermore, if one has a good amount of knowledge in many academic subjects he can find many job profile with interest. Like in the previous example, if I want to work in environment-related job, so I can get it as I have knowledge of the mechanical as well as environment. So, to compete in today's world and to get good job knowledge of different field must be required.
In conclusion, many people think that it is good to become specialised in any particular subject. But, it is better to have knowledge of as many as possible academic subjects. From that, he can competitive with others as well it is must require to get success in any new invention and improvement of anything. Correlation of different field of knowledge must necessary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...lternative of medicine or drug or for a new invention for that correlation is required. But a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'competing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: competing
.... So, knowledge of many fields requires to compete with others and get a good job. Further...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'getting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: getting
... with others as well it is must require to get success in any new invention and improv...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...t is must require to get success in any new invention and improvement of anything. Correlatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2192.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98181818182 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03879869696 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.411363636364 0.524837075471 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 707.4 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4522858458 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.68 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.96 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341910768824 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132494883107 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113718704275 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251873506769 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503894895758 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.