Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Law, by the definition, is that which are actually regulation and keep the system prosper and flourish. It is typically disputed that law should be firm in every situation regardless of flexible to take account of various circumstances, time and places. I disapprove of the basis of various circumstances, time and places, the law should be accountable for flexible enough. Firstly, I delineate some important issues of a firm law monitoring and secondly, how firm law helps to keep a system more sound.
First of all, the Law should be always treated equally. Although it is obvious that some crimes are not to be treated for every country on the basis of the same law but it is always equal for every individual country's people. For instance, if someone harasses a woman and raped, according to the Saudi Arab, they must be punished by losing their head in front of people but other countries control this crime to punished by the jailor gibbet. furthermore, most important moto of the law is to control and maintain a proper system like all over the country in every industry follow the on system, if someone employee contact any wrongdoing, he or she must be fire out the company and this system not only for individual group of people behind to maintain all employee in the factory.
Secondly, rules and regulations always help to make a system sound and better. without the following regulation it would not possible to bring any success and would have possible to occurred system loss and various crimes. For instance, in Bangladesh for money transfer from one country to another not to follow the same regulation for general and government officers. as a result before some years, money laundering and various corruption getting higher by the government officer and country has suffered lots of economical bounds. and then after several years, Bangladesh change its money transferring policy and make a firm consideration for all peoples and able to control this corruption.
In conclusion, it is better to maintain firm law consideration for everyone and every sector to keep the system sound. But there are some people who prefer the flexibility of law of various circumstances, times and places. Personally, I believe that a good frim law only assures good prospective output.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 444, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...crime to punished by the jailor gibbet. furthermore, most important moto of the law is to c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 80, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Without
...help to make a system sound and better. without the following regulation it would not p...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 370, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...on for general and government officers. as a result before some years, money laund...
^^
Line 11, column 534, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...has suffered lots of economical bounds. and then after several years, Bangladesh ch...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05235602094 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76518734761 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486910994764 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0617073122 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.625 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294381481565 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129311206516 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182913373233 0.0737576698707 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209769508132 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180446070645 0.0645574589148 280% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.