Currently, a controversy issue arises as to how to ensure the prosperity and success of a country. Regarding this issue, people's views vary from individuals to individuals. Some people believe that improving agriculture and access to affordable housing is an effective way, whole others hold the opposite opinions. From my perspective, creating jobs for unemployed workers is good for the public.
The primary reason to support my opinion is that creating enough jobs for unemployed workers contribute to social sustainment. In general, the majority of crimes result from unsatisfied basic life requirement for individuals. and then, they may use some conflicted methods to express angry to this society. But, if the government could create enough positions, people’s life quality and income will be improved, leading to peaceful society. Greek deserved to be mentioned. In the past, according to a data shows that almost 70 percent of individuals lost their job because of the economic crisis, so they had no choice but to shot children in the school to express their negative emotion. In order to solve this serious problem, the government built dam and created 1000 positions to individuals. Even though the salary was not really high, it solved people’s life requirement and sustained the social peace.
What’s more, another reason we should not overlook is that creating jobs for unemployed individuals can promote the economic prosperity. To be precise, if everyone has a job to devote themselves, they will create value and wealth to this society, leading to increase the tax income for the country. Therefore, the GDP for this country will be soared certainly. Returning to prior example, after creating jobs for unemployed person about three years, the tax income for the Greek government also improved almost 2000 million each year. So, local government could use these capitals to invest on other areas, like exploring new resources and international trade with other countries. After five years, the GDP in Greek has been enhanced almost 10 percent.
In terms of improving agriculture and ensuring low food prices, as well as the affordable house, it can ensure people's basic life requirement immediately. But these ways only focus on one aspect of individuals’ issues. Because of lack of enough money, other issues, like education and medical treatment, still cannot be satisfied. Therefore, the prosperity and success of the country may not be achieved.
To sum up, from what has been discussed, we may draw a conclusion that creating jobs is a good way to enhance countries’ flourishing and success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...basic life requirement for individuals. and then, they may use some conflicted meth...
^^^
Line 5, column 760, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ek has been enhanced almost 10 percent. In terms of improving agriculture and en...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess of the country may not be achieved. To sum up, from what has been discussed,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, really, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, well, as to, in general, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2236.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34928229665 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92195280598 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555023923445 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.94265232975 303% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6459021228 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2173913043 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1739130435 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17391304348 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181888336418 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520384967084 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496331079644 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112723820667 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312770323263 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.