Leaders must pay attention to the advice and opinions of other people (agree/disagree)
People live in a society that everyone is a member of at least one group. Members in a group have a specific role and a significant role in a team is a leader’s role. The leader has to manage everyone’s duty and relationships between them and solve problems. Although some people think that the leaders don’t need to pay attention to the advice of other people and decide based on his opinions, I think it is better for a leader to listen to others points and use them in the solutions. I am going to discuss three reasons why I think in this way.
First of all, every person has a different view of life and can produce various solutions when coming across problems. When a leader has an obligation to protect the team by own, he has to make the best decision. So, if a leader consults with others he will have different methods that maybe he didn’t even think about them. For instance, when I was at university working with my friends on our semester project, I, as the leader, paid close attention to everyone’s viewpoints and their opinions, which were very helpful. Consequently, I manage to find a new way to improve the accuracy of our model by combining everyone’s point.
Secondly, another positive point of this notion is that when the leader talks with members to share their ideas and views, even it will help leaders to make a decision also it will help members to feel their thoughts are important and they have a voice in their company. Furthermore, members will be happy and feel good about their workplace and leader. It increases efficiency and keeps members motivated. Leaders would work more effectively when they realize that their team is satisfied with their performance and the progress of their group or company.
Finally, groups usually have a limited budget and time so, the leader should take the best way to don’t waste the money. Leaders usually try to hold a series of meetings with business experts and engineers in order to discuss possible ways of conducting their massive projects and to reduce the capital cost. In summary, consultation with others is a necessity for leaders.
In the short, however, some people think in the opposite way I think leaders should listen carefully to advice and opinions of other people. This policy would benefit the leader, other people, and their company. I highly recommend all leaders to adopt this policy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, as to, at least, for instance, i think, in summary, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87439613527 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68956336222 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514492753623 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.74738488 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.65 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218635481818 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681945861491 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077745845831 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136259001761 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821757745021 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.