Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the
present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and
examples to support your answer.
Our life consists of three time's events: past, present and future. Consequences of those events are interconnected and one has great impact on the next phase. Therefore, it is certain that everyone should learn from the past incidents to strengthen the weakness of our system. I personally believe that we should learn from the past facts for the betterment of our present and future life.
First and foremost, the past is the enumerrated catalog of any system's loop-holes and one can better use of those by learning from them and strengthen those weakpoints. In addition to that, one can reduce the probability of making mistake by enhancing his skills based on the past errors. Like, I used to enlist my errors of my past exam and I emphasized on them to make them better and I got better score than past years. What's more, our present success dully depends on the the hard work we had done in the past. Therefore, it is certain that one must learn from his past events to improve his present and future life.
Secondly, in the present day every sector is developed gradually by improving on the past failures. From history to advanced scientific research, we gradually enhance our past weekness and make our system better than previous. For instance, in the scientific research, we use to track and take referrences from previous work and enhance our knowledge and our system more robust and skillful. Like, observing the effect of radio active element on the silver bromid paper, Ratherford invented the radio activity and the radio active materials. In addition to that, form the ancient culture, we learn our ansestor's life and the social structure and use those lessons in our present works.
Finally, it is not possible to know every twist and problems of our society and work. Therefore, we should learn from our previous weakness, show that we can predict possible problems of our system. So, it is pragmatic to learn from our past.
In conclusion, it has a positive consequences to learn from the past events. In every aspects of life and work, we learn from the past incidents and make our life better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...and I got better score than past years. Whats more, our present success dully depends...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...e, our present success dully depends on the the hard work we had done in the past. Ther...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...e, our present success dully depends on the the hard work we had done in the past. Ther...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...nstance, in the scientific research, we use to track and take referrences from prev...
^^^
Line 9, column 34, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consequence'?
Suggestion: consequence
...st. In conclusion, it has a positive consequences to learn from the past events. In every...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8650137741 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54146527702 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449035812672 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7687279815 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9473684211 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123875877539 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545495836903 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344372555043 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877664209236 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026944256277 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.