Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The innovation of new technology helps to improve our lives in different ways. Development of the new instrument for cooking facilitates various advantages and now it is easy to make food than previously. I strongly agree with the statement that easier way of food preparation improves our life. I support this because of various reasons- saving the time, increase nutrition value of the food and reduction of different risk involving in the cooking process.
First and foremost, nowadays, there are different types of instruments can prepare the food swiftly than before. For example, we are now using mixer grinder to make the fine powder of hard ingredients very quickly. As a result, one can not only save time but also our energy. That time and energy can be used in other productive works like reading the course works or preparing reports. As a working professional, I can save my huge time by using a different modern instrument in my kitchen and invest that valuable time for the preparation of my study.
Secondly, presently cooking is easy and takes very few time due to the use of multifarious instruments. For example, the cooking time is reduced by the introduction of Micro-wave oven and pressure cooker, that not only use heat but also exert mechanical force and inferred ray to accelerate the boiling process. In addition to that, those instruments increase the nutrition value in our food, because the lesser time of cooking is beneficial to retain the food value in the food. In that way, the improved process of cooking helps by retaining more nutritious supplement in food than the previous time.
Finally, the improvement of the cooking process also helps to reduce the risk factors involved in the different cooking steps. Like, previously people used the coal-fired oven and the gas-fired oven, those caused various conflagration and burnt during cooking much time in past. Those risky instruments are superseded by new induction oven and microwave oven. Therefore, the development of new cooking ways helps to reduce the risk factors.
In conclusion, I am strongly agreeing that the easier food preparation process has improved human life in a various way. The change in cooking beneficiates our life by reducing cooking time, reducing risk factors and increasing nutrition values of food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...tion and burnt during cooking much time in past. Those risky instruments are superseded...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ways helps to reduce the risk factors. In conclusion, I am strongly agreeing th...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 18, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...the risk factors. In conclusion, I am strongly agreeing that the easier food preparation proces...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 104, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a various way" with adverb for "various"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...aration process has improved human life in a various way. The change in cooking beneficiates ou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13984168865 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78489511453 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488126649077 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.345144505 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.526315789 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166959938894 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612253704354 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474940229585 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108394883905 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517424595339 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.