Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced
based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other
people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why?
Undoubtedly, there are several mediums that provide people with cultural and literal topics, which each one has its unique qualities and features. Books, movies, and musics give us a great deal of entertaining and educational materials which is worth spending time to see or read them. While some people are interested to watch movies which has been made based on novel or book before reading them, others like to read a book before seeing the movie about that. In my opinion, it is better to read a book and after that see the movie related to that. In the following paragraghs, I will elaborate on my reasons.
First,reading books are more interesting than movies in general, and they present more details about the stories and their main character in most of the times. In books there is not a strict limitation which prohibit the writer to avoid explaining the details of story. Books provide readers with a comprehensive information whcih help them imagine the happening alike to the real world. For example, when ever I read a book or a novel that I am interested, I involved thoroughly and involved with the main character. This engaging erose a roaler coaster of emotions in me which last for a long time after the finishing the book. The last book the I read and watch the movie which was made based on that was Harry patter. This experience thought me that reading books is more engaging than watching movies. Had I not read the harry patter book before that, I could not have enjoy very much.
Second, a film based on a book gives us a limited general information and data about the story based on the attitude of the fillmmaker. It is not necessarilly the only concivable aspect of view toward the story of a book. Filmmakers enlist their imagination to picture the story of a book and based on the limitiation of movie making they inevitably should condence and omit some part of the story. This elimination sometimes change the whole meaning of the topic and adventures in a book. It happens a lot of time that a mundane movie based on a book ruin the eagerness of readers about a book, and consequently readers put them aside and never read that. My personal example clearly illlustrate this point. When I was young I saw a movie whcih had made based on the famous "Oldman and sea" book of Hemingvay. That movie distorted the whole story and did not impact me well. I did not want to read that beautiful book for a longtime, since a saw that in my father library and after scanning some chapters that I found that It was a good read. As we see, filmmakers may have different incentive when they want to make a movie whcih may divert the main meaning of the book.
In sum, I strongly believe that reading books is a good habit before watching movies based on them. That is because books present more details in their story whcih make reader follow them enthusiastically and because you do not have to understand the writer ideas based on the filmmakers attitude which may differ a lot.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aghs, I will elaborate on my reasons. First,reading books are more interesting...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , reading
...l elaborate on my reasons. First,reading books are more interesting than movies ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 546, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he main character. This engaging erose a roaler coaster of emotions in me which l...
^^
Line 2, column 652, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'I'?
Suggestion: the; I
...r the finishing the book. The last book the I read and watch the movie which was made...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 716, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'harried'.
Suggestion: Harried
... movie which was made based on that was Harry patter. This experience thought me that...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 830, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ng than watching movies. Had I not read the harry patter book before that, I could not ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 882, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'enjoyed'.
Suggestion: enjoyed
...tter book before that, I could not have enjoy very much. Second, a film based...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at, I could not have enjoy very much. Second, a film based on a book gives us ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... divert the main meaning of the book. In sum, I strongly believe that reading ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'filmmakers'' or 'filmmaker's'?
Suggestion: filmmakers'; filmmaker's
...nderstand the writer ideas based on the filmmakers attitude which may differ a lot.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, in general, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.0286738351 245% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2478.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 535.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63177570093 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56284517412 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441121495327 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 787.5 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1015522821 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.12 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.96 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.499991346218 0.236089414692 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147093209232 0.076458572812 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10669296008 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335282124854 0.150856017488 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270612376746 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.