Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why?
There are lots of notions about this statement. Some people contend that it is better reading book at first in details and imagining what should be happened during the film then watching the film in order to understand every situations and action throughout the show, yet I totally hold the opposite view, I have some reasons that I will expand on them in the following paragraphs.
My first and foremost reason is that watching movie at first is a kind of saving money and time due to the fact that we all know a film is cheaper than a book; in addition, the time of a film is at last three hours (talking about a movie, not a serial that has lots of episodes), so for not squander our time and money it is better to watch movie at first; subsequent to that, we could determine whether the book is worth it to purchase or not. In my country, there are not lots of movies that based on books, these kinds of movies are foreign films; they are expensive and their books are scarce, so I personally choose to watch my favorite film at first step if I am satisfied, at latter step I try to find and buy its book.
My second reason that deserves to mention is that in my points of view these classes of films are authentically kinds of summary of their books. When we buy a book, first we read a brief summary of that; hence, every time we see a film; indeed, we are seeing the summary of its book. If we like the summary, we tend to buy its book and read the happenings in detail. I have a personal example of it. Ten years ago when I was a juvenile, I read books a lot and my strategy was that- at first, I should read books then buy the film. Not all the time I was satisfied by the book and in the middle of the story, I put the book down and started a new book. In this way, I had lots of books that either I did not read half of them. After a while I perceived that it was not a wise approach I had and I initialed watching movies first; as a result, I comprehended that the movie summarized the book; I had understood my fault and exploited the method which if I love the movie, go and buy its book. By this method not only did I watch lots of movies, but also I was abled saving my money in order to buy my favorite books.
To make a long story short, watching book-based movies at first is a wise approach that anybody could adopt in order to not spare their worthwhile time and money. Besides, a boring summary is better than a boring book, so it is highly recommended that watch the summary then buy the whole story.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: SUBSEQUENT_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'after'
Suggestion: after
...y it is better to watch movie at first; subsequent to that, we could determine whether the bo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 950, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...my fault and exploited the method which if I love the movie, go and buy its book. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, second, so, then, while, in addition, kind of, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 77.0 43.0788530466 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 492.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.13617886179 4.8611393121 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28548121489 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430894308943 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.333111782 48.9658058833 225% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 135.666666667 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8 20.6045352989 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369205439917 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131543074392 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874544287641 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241347181074 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402342387755 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.1575268817 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.32 10.9000537634 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.002688172 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.