The government can take a variety of actions to help protect the environment. Which one of the following do you think is the most important for the nation’s government to take to protect the environment? 1. Fund the research to develop environmentally friendly energy sources such as solar and wind energy. 2. Preserve the natural places like forests and protect the animals that live there 3. Enforce laws to prevent the pollution of air and water by large companies
From the past till now, human beings have influenced the environment and polluted it in several ways. Besides, the condition improvement of the environment is indispensable for both humans' and animals' lives. There are lots of ways in order to develop environments' status. I personally have an insight that dedicating budget to the modern source of energy is the clue. Turning a blind eye to those who support or repudiate the contention, I lean towards conspicuous reasons which will be elaborated as follows.
The first and foremost notion that I assert is nowadays fossil fuels have bad effects on the environment and deteriorate lots of environmental resources for which are both humans and animals; in comparison, new kinds of energies such as solar and wind energy do not have these kinds of destroyable influence on the environment, due to the fact that they come from the environment and also do not have the pollution effect on the earth. Let me illustrate it with one example, the regular kinds of energies that use these days are fossil fuels that utilize in cars, for warming houses in the cool climate, as fuels in industries, and so on. These fuels pollute the air and water every day in extensive regions. Besides, people and industries have used fossil fuels for several years; therefore, our environment is dramatically in harsh condition. Hence, by funding the new environmentally friendly projects, the government could save humans, animals, and their living areas.
The latter reason which I assert is that these kinds of projects are lucrative for the government. Nowadays peoples’ knowledge about the energy, environment, and the importance of its protection grow. They are more enthusiastic about the animals' conditions, also are more worried about their health. They know that if the environmental conditions increase the level of life for both humans and animals will grow. Therefore, they are willing to spend money on the kinds of energy which are safer for them. In this condition, if the government starts to advertise its project in an effective way there are more people to invest money in them. Hence, all of the expanses of the project will be compensated by the means of the project's income from people.
To make a long story short, dedicating budget on these kinds of projects which are about new energies, not only can improve the quality of the environment but also it is lucrative for the government. In the end, I firmly recommend that authentically it is worth it to fund a surplus budget on the project.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ernment starts to advertise its project in an effective way there are more people to invest money i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... people to invest money in them. Hence, all of the expanses of the project will be compens...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 723, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'projects'' or 'project's'?
Suggestion: projects'; project's
...will be compensated by the means of the projects income from people. To make a long sto...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, so, then, therefore, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99764705882 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82463311762 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496470588235 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.3209756276 48.9658058833 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.789473684 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3684210526 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189284375555 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576103498489 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436050870605 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110049896619 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193646842877 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.