Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why?
Many film directors and writers are resorting to the idea of making movies and dramas based on popular books that most of us know. They do it after witnessing the amazing success of the book and how it gained a great fan base. Some people watch the movie directly without reading the novel, but others like indulging in the book first and maybe later watch the movie version. I prefer reading the novel and then watch the film for two reasons.
First of all, reading novels before watching helps the brain to be imaginative and creative. Whenever people get the opportunity to read the book, they portray the scenes and the characters in a totally different way compared to the movie. That is what makes readers eager to read before watching because they want to have the pleasure of unleashing their imagination. For instance, recently while I was reading "The book thief" which talks about the life of a German girl in the Nazi time, I would imagine how her house looked like, and how she would laugh or cry. I can picture it the way I desire freely and with no limits unlike seeing it first which will give no room for my imagination, and I would be reading knowing what her home resembles and what her bed looks like.
Secondly, readers might not be interested in having the book after seeing it on TV. It is undoubtedly true that there is plenty of films that disappoint us not because the plot is bad but because the actors and directors were not able to pull it off well. As a result, we hate the movie and think that the book is the same while in reality, it is untrue. For example, I watched a film called "Murder on the Orient Express" before reading the book as I had no idea that the movie was a depiction of the story. I did not like the movie at all, and I felt that it was rushed and the protagonist was weird. Therefore, when my sister told me about the book, I did not feel intrigued to look at it at all. However, one day I happened to look at it at my friend's house, and I honestly fell in love with the story and everything about it.
In conclusion, I advocate with the notion of never watching a movie based on a book unless I have finished the book. I believe in that so I can give my mind space to fly in imaginations and be able to know the real story so that I do not get disappointed
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd then watch the film for two reasons. First of all, reading novels before watc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: EAGER_TO[1]
Message: With 'eager to', use the base form of the verb: 'read'.
Suggestion: read
...ie. That is what makes readers eager to read before watching because they want to ha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 788, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... resembles and what her bed looks like. Secondly, readers might not be intereste...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...my mind space to fly in imaginations and be able to know the real story so that I...
^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... story so that I do not get disappointed
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, honestly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34474885845 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41104214088 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497716894977 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5362000085 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.722222222 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311008266482 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101710894656 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893885820029 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202713614994 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108454983938 0.0645574589148 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 10.9000537634 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.