Many movie makers make movies based on books. Some people prefer to read the book before they watch the movie, while other people prefer to the movie before they read the book. Which do you prefer?
People obtain different attitudes toward movies based on books. While some people prefer to read the novel before they observe the movie, other people adore viewing the film before they read the book. It is so controvertible for them to determine a specific way. In my view, they should read the book before they watch the movie. They can compare the narrative of the film with an original story and comprehend the passion of the writer.
To begin with, people acquire a comparison between the original story and movie to read the book before watching the movie. In the book, it is not a limited amount of contexts to write about stories. Therefore, the authors add many details and backgrounds of each character. They also include the relationships of sub-characters without the main-characters. On the other hand, people only attain stories by an average of two hours in the movies. For this reason, the tales of the movie are slightly varied from the original story, so it is not ample for people to recognize the stories with only the film. As a result, they should get an opportunity to read the book before they watch the movie.
Secondly, reading the book before viewing the movie gives people to grasp the passion of the author writing the book. It often modifies the authors between the book and the film, so they show alternative approaches against each product. For instance, the author who comes up with an original story about the book provides people real experiences that happened in his life. People establish an imagination about the story in their brains because the story is so real. However, the author who has requested the book as the movie does not interpret the real situations experienced by the book author even if they make a conversation with each other before he starts making the movie. Thus, people misunderstand the meaning of stories expressed by the book author.
To sum up, people should read the book before they watch the movie. I surely believe that they can compare the original story and the movie and achieve the passion of authors who write the book.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84444444444 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49396803171 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455555555556 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4344760882 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488195288665 0.236089414692 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170391364376 0.076458572812 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134725713822 0.0737576698707 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.367599843671 0.150856017488 244% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652093557938 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.