Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is difficult for teachers to be both popular(liked by students) and effective in helping students in learning.
Professors have various aspects to earn a professional job in a school. While some teachers are popular among students and good at teaching a subject effectively, others only follow one way of the advantages. It is so controvertible for professors to have both the characters. In my view, teachers inevitably could not be the ideal to be popular and effective. Once they become popular among students, they could not inspire students especially by lectures, keep the relationship between teachers and students, and frequently remain a topic about their lectures.
To begin with, teachers could not attract students to lectures if students started to like them. Most students would not be curious about writing down the notes about the lectures they are interested in because they adore listening to an ordinary off-topic conversation instead of class material. For example, when I was a high school student, the teacher I was intriguing taught English in a classroom. Even though he was good at teaching English, I just tried to hear his talks about icebreaking. Therefore, I could not concentrate on the lecture anymore. From this perspective, it would be difficult for teachers to be both popular and operative.
Secondly, the relationship between professor and student would collapse when the teacher becomes popular. Generally speaking, the attitude of students is certainly so generous and polite because teachers are higher than students in the hierarchy between them. On the other hand, if students like their professors, they definitely pretend to show their attitude in a school as the same friendship as their friends. Consequently, they would not be keen on taking a class even if their teachers acquire the advanced method to teach students about some subjects.
Finally, teacher who constructs popularity and effective teaching way often derails a topic about a class. Some lecturers try to talk about general topics soon after starting a lecture such as news, political issues, and what they ate at last dinner time, and so on. After that, students getting into the professors by a curiosity try to inflate the topics more and more. As a result, it would be limited time to teach some ample class materials by teachers every lecture even if they are good at teaching their proficiency.
To sum up, it is demanding for lecturers to be both favored by students and effective to teach students in a lecture. I surely believe that professors could not push students on studying, retain the relationship between them, and follow the schedule they created by derailing topics about classes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18720379147 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81818518573 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497630331754 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8814446541 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.238095238 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0952380952 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47619047619 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303850342704 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110473389696 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854608048609 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201404261177 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061705080286 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.