Which one do you think is important to long-lasting friendship?
1. Help you when you need
2. Share same interest and hobby
3. mutual trust
Making long-lasting friendships has several methods. While some people establish the friendship to help others when they need, others obtain similar interest and hobby. Moreover, another trust together in-depth. It is so controvertible for people to determine a specific way among these choices. In my view, it is the best way that people acquire the same interest and hobbies rather than other selections. They can burst tons of topics they can talk about, go out engaging in identical interest with each other, and easily contact each other.
To begin with, knowing the same interest for long-lasting friendship would provide people with a lot of talking materials. It is significant for people to make a strong bond with others through conversations. For example, in school, people have to introduce themselves either in a group or in front of a classroom. Then, they try to introduce their interest, major, and family structures, and so on. If people cannot find out the same interest with them while listening to the talks, it is not enough for them to attract others to be a long-lasting friendship. Therefore, it is momentum for people to attain an opportunity to know the corresponding interest with others.
Secondly, what people hang out with others who establish the same interest produces an impact on their long-lasting friendship. The best way for people to enhance the possibility of long-lasting friendship is to go out anywhere with each other. Thus, they gain more situations to know about others. Moreover, the same interest and hobbies would be a lure to hang out with each other because they can go to places where they can implement their hobbies such as reading books, playing sports, and going shopping, and so on.
Finally, the easy invitation to people who procure the same interest increases the possibility of being long-lasting friendship. When people ponder whether they invite others who have the same interest to hang out or others considering their hobbies are unfamiliar with them, they definitely select the friends sharing the same hobbies. If they have to hang out with others unrelated to their hobbies, it is difficult for them to enjoy shopping and driving in their deep emotion. They may be reluctant to playing games and sports they do not like. As a result, it is easy for people who want to construct a long-lasting relationship with others to figure out the related interest.
To sum up, it is the best way for people to gather same hobbies with others in order to earn long-lasting relationship. I surely believe that they can boost a bunch of topics in conversation, go out to the associated place for their interest with each other, and easily ask others to go out.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their hobbies are unfamiliar with them, they definitely select the friends shari...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2274.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00881057269 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.784350073 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447136563877 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5713039322 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8695652174 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7391304348 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5652173913 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153892594452 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066977615196 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537376239093 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112252489438 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230497057096 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.