In many places, students aged 12-18 are typically taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are usually taught by only one teacher all day long. However, it would also benefit younger students to be taught by several different teachers every day.
It is undeniable that teachers play a vital role in children’s academic and intellectual development. After all, young students rely on their teachers to gain knowledge for success and pursue their interests. Yet, there could be a debate over whether or not younger students need different teachers for different subjects. Some might argue that one teacher should suffice in order for them to learn all core subjects. However, I believe that they can benefit from having several different teachers every day for three reasons.
To begin with, it is important that a teacher has the expertise and experience needed in order to give his students a high quality education. In other words, they need to possess profound knowledge of the subjects they teach. Otherwise, there is no point in going to school and learning from teachers because children could also gain general education from their parents. Nonetheless, most primary school teachers teach every core subject to their students but may only be highly skilled in one or two of those. As a result, it is not easy for ateacher to effectively conduct lessons on each and every one of them. From my personal experience, I learned that I was lacking in math and science skills in the fourth grade because I was not properly prepared by my third grade teacher who taught every single subject all by herself. To be honest, the teacher was terrible at teaching science and math although she was good at language arts and social studies. Because of this, I fell behind and was not able to build a good foundation in those subjects in order to do well in other grade levels. This clearly depicts that even young learners need a quality education offered by many specialized educators in school rather than learning from one teacher with general knowledge.
Another major consideration is that young students should be able to have the chance to be taught by multiple teachers to build their interests and get a balanced and multifaceted education needed to pursue them. Primary school teachers all have their own interests and biases about certain subjects. Therefore, the teachers’ lessons may reflect on their unbalanced personal views regardless of the students’ passion. For example, if a student is into art and wants to get feedback from his teacher, his teacher may ignore his request and try to sway him towards a different subject preferred by the teacher. This would not happen if the student had a separate teacher for art. The art teacher could give the student encouragement or show different art skills for improvement or creativity. This indicates that having different teachers will likely give students the motivation to pursue diverse interests and develop as individuals.
Lastly, one should think about the physical and mental limitations of an individual teacher and the number of students a teacher has to accommodate. Teaching can be extremely demanding with long hours and a heavy workload, and it's easy for them to fall prey to burnout, which will affect the quality of education greatly. That is why different teachers have to work as a team. For instance, team teaching, especially for subjects like science and math, can be advantageous to both teachers and students. Teachers don't always have to singularly meet the needs of all of their students when they work as a team. From the student's perspective, the good thing about having several teachers is that even if one of them is not very good, the student only has him or her for part of the day. Also, shuffling from class to class breaks up the monotony. This points to the fact that children would learn better from multiple teachers.
In summary, there are many reasons why young learners should be taught by a variety of teachers in school. This will allow students to have access to a more qualified, diverse, and robust education, giving students the chance to develop and pursue their own interests with the specialized support they deserve.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ests. Yet, there could be a debate over whether or not younger students need different teacher...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 477, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...lieve that they can benefit from having several different teachers every day for three reasons. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: EACH_AND_EVERY[1]
Message: Consider using 'each one'.
Suggestion: each one
...acher to effectively conduct lessons on each and every one of them. From my personal experience, I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 514, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...to both teachers and students. Teachers dont always have to singularly meet the need...
^^^^
Line 7, column 620, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ents when they work as a team. From the students perspective, the good thing about havin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 896, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...s to the fact that children would learn better from multiple teachers. In summary, t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, third, well, after all, as to, for example, for instance, in general, in summary, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 29.0 13.8261648746 210% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 52.1666666667 171% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3334.0 1977.66487455 169% => OK
No of words: 665.0 407.700716846 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01353383459 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.07814867018 4.48103885553 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66782174844 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 299.0 212.727598566 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44962406015 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 999.9 618.680645161 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6725547663 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.548387097 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4516129032 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09677419355 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368792634772 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107621065474 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698119789568 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23591484865 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610940593864 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.