Many school require young children(aged 5-11) to study together in small groups instead of studying alone. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Requiring children to study in groups in the best way to teach them and why?
Children obtain several ways to study for their education. While some young people study together in small groups instead of investigating alone, others do not believe. It is so controvertible for people to determine a specific conclusion. In my view, young children should study with others instead of study alone. This activity boosts their communication skills, increases their potential of information, and acquire concentration on education.
To begin with, children attain communication skills by study with others. When people finish homework or review past classes alone, they do not hold an opportunity to talk with others. As a result, it is so limited for them to gain just wisdom for study and grade for graduation. On the other hand, if there is a chance to study with friends, they not only polish their knowledge but also make conversations with themselves. They should establish communication ability from an early stage of life for their future by group study.
Secondly, studying together in small groups enhances the possibility of knowledge between young children. It is confined for them to consider themselves about problems for study. Therefore, they do not gain bountiful intelligence to exploit in their future life. However, they are capable of sharing plenty of ideas in the situation where they study each other. Take myself as an example, I worked alone for my homework when I was a junior high school student. As I faced problems with how to connect my ideas and the professor’s opinion, I asked my friend to give me a piece of advice. Thus, I concluded my statement by inquiries with my friend.
Finally, young people can focus on the study by group work with their friends. Generally speaking, it is difficult for people to devote their time on study alone because they lose their passion for learning by smartphone, television, and magazine, and so on. Once they decide to study with their friend, they point out each other. Moreover, they come up with the idea that they do not want to lose a friend in tests or homework. Their friend definitely becomes the motivation for study.
To sum up, young children should provide the opportunity to study with their fellows. I surely believe that they create developed conversation skills, boost their consciousness of education, and concentrate on study more than alone.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11917098446 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78860950817 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525906735751 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3551890128 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3333333333 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0833333333 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54166666667 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27442151768 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103224224302 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984894716395 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189519740735 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559063099938 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.