Modern agriculture methods damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
As the population grows, more food need to be provided by using the modern technology, but the technology can threaten the environment, which kindles people’s interest whether the significance of providing food overrides the importance of protecting the environment. Some people suppose that people should provide enough food for the growing population, while other people prefer protecting the environment to providing the food. From my perspective, feeding the population should be the priority..
To begin with, feeding the population is of higher urgency considering the survival of human civilization. The need for food increases continuously, but the limited resources on the earth require us to provide more food for the growing population. Such is the case for many people living in Africa, where the local residents are facing a short longevity due to the weaker body generated by the deficiency of food. Suffering from severe hunger, most of the children there have to struggle with malnutrition and a serious of diseases caused by it. Hence, it is not surprising that the producing food should be the first choice.
Modern agriculture methods, on the other hand, do not necessarily lead to the deterioration of the environment. Such is the case for drip irrigation, which, as one of the methods used extensively in water-deprived areas like Israel, does little harm to the environment. This irrigating technology constructs an underground system to allow water to drip slowly to the deep of the plant. In this way, crops can grow well with lower water consumption, which, contrary to the statement that modern agriculture is detrimental the environment, primarily contributes to a better environment. Consequently, without being afraid of damaging the environment, growing more food is the top option.
Admittedly, protecting the environment is significant, since the living quality of human being will be greatly affected when they have to endure a polluted Earth; however, human survival, rather than high living quality, should be regarded as the first priority in current world. When attention is shifted to undeveloped countries in Africa, Asia and South America, there still exist numerous people dying of starvation or hunger-induced diseases like serious malnutrition. Assisting these people in escaping this misery is a far more urgent matter.
To light up the point I have discussed, there exist no questions to feed the population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 502, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ng the population should be the priority.. To begin with, feeding the populat...
^^
Line 9, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oes little harm to the environment. This irrigating technology constructs an unde...
^^
Line 13, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his misery is a far more urgent matter. To light up the point I have discussed, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, so, still, well, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2096.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4725848564 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09663436335 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556135770235 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3266256801 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.294117647 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5294117647 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357939680489 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101827484706 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884198216684 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162554005162 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120260031734 0.0645574589148 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.