No books should ever be banned.
Banning books is equivalent to obscuring the world from the knowledge of great writers. Personally, I believe that the fundamental law of liberty to expression guarantees the individuals to publicly display their opinions in the form of writing or audio format. Books are the medium of transfer of information from one people to another over place and time effectively. Therefore, I think that banning books would be harmful to humanity in the process of pursuit of truth. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, people have become so much sensitive to the content of the books that they cannot bare it for even a small period of time. But, if we think it rationally, then we can say that anyone who doesn't like a book can choose not to read. Just screaming to ban a book if you don't like doesn't feels to me a valid argument. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. In my childhood I used to read a novel series of Ketan Chauhan. It was one of the best novel series I have ever read in my life. I was eagerly waiting for the next book when the people from other religious community started protesting to ban the author and his books. In response to the overwhelming number of people, the government of my province banned the series. The only reason for banning it was that, the sentiments of people were hurt because it didn't matched their views.
Furthermore, people claim that books sometimes conveys the biases of the author. According to them, books does not enlighten the reader with the truth. Fundamental purpose of a book is to transfer the thought process and the imagination of the author to the reader. It has nothing to do with the transmission of truth. I think that people who believe that the author should be a candor are the most foolish individuals. Personally, I read a book for entertainment purpose and it would not affect my choices until there is a serious evidence mentioned by the experiments performed by the writer. For instance, I read the book named atomic habits. It helped me to make illusion in my mind that I have to improve incrementally everyday. Moreover, the views belonged to the author, but his experiences helped me in my life, and therefore, I started believing in his ideas and finally implemented a schedule accoding to the book.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that books should never be banned. This is because books are not required to provide the truth and books are invaluable thoughts of its author that the readers want to understand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...at they cannot bare it for even a small period of time. But, if we think it rationally, then w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...onally, then we can say that anyone who doesnt like a book can choose not to read. Jus...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ad. Just screaming to ban a book if you dont like doesnt feels to me a valid argumen...
^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...creaming to ban a book if you dont like doesnt feels to me a valid argument. My person...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 844, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ntiments of people were hurt because it didnt matched their views. Furthermore, pe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 725, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...nd that I have to improve incrementally everyday. Moreover, the views belonged to the au...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2122.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72605790646 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73165466206 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507795100223 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2986997168 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.88 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.96 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28532819263 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782191909785 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069704503792 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188251276633 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371261134253 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.