Nowadays, many movies or films are based on books. Some people prefer to read the original
book before they watch the movie, other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book.
Which one do you prefer?
With the appearance of new technology, more and more people likely to see a movie through phones and ipad because they are portable. It really changes the people’s lifestyle. But some people recently purposed that they prefer to read the books first before they see the movies and this is regarded as unreasonable by others. In my opinion, I prefer to read the book first.
First of all, reading books first allow people to imagine freely. One direct benefit of it is that people can imagine the action and the picture in details based on books. As a result, when they see the movie, they can compare the movie with their thought. On the other hand, if people see the movie before reading the book, their imagination will be limited by movies. Thus, it is true that they cannot enjoy reading books well.
Beside, another cause that should be taken into consideration is that the priority of enjoying the movies is the background of the movies. If people know less about the movies’ story, they hardly can have the same feeling with the director and that is because the time of movies is too short to think a lot for audiences. In other words, reading books before watching movies can help people have a deep understanding of the story which can help them enjoy seeing the movies better.
Finally, something else is that now some movies harm the ideas which the books want to show. It means that watching movies first will mislead the books’ impression to audience. Thus the value of books’ story only can be dig by readers and it is a wise idea to read first.
In conclusion, reading books has more advantages than seeing movies first. That is because not only people are able to imagine freely but also the background will help people understand movies deeply.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-12-07 | jiaoj27@hotmail.com | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
- People who cannot accept criticism will not succeed working in teams 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Getting advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting advice from friends in your same age 60
- Nowadays, many movies or films are based on books. Some people prefer to read the originalbook before they watch the movie, other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book.Which one do you prefer? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...the books' impression to audience. Thus the value of books' story only can...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, really, so, thus, well, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74919614148 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38773640499 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488745980707 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3073243041 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8823529412 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23529411765 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403917054239 0.236089414692 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14261405743 0.076458572812 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838486175704 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235232823501 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622097946131 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.