Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People always concerns whether or not their jobs can provide them with a steady or successful life in the future so they prefer to choose a job which seems stable or earn more money easily. Although there are some careers offering people’s great ways to make a living, as far as I am concerned, it is more difficult for people to realize the quality of jobs than before.
First of all, many industries are invested by advanced technology for imaginative possibility, as a result many jobs can help people to be successful. Because of the development of computer science, numbers of companies can use computer as a tool to create more profile. For instance, there are many companies to get rid of old commercial model by using advanced technology. Traditionally, products only could be sold in stores for only nearby people. Now computers and network allow people to sale their products online for people all over the world, which is cannot indicted before the changes’ occurring. Thus, the advanced technology is to work as the designers is to cars, which means that the variety possibility that is true for appearance of cars is also true for potential of different of jobs empowered by advanced technology.
Secondly, another fact should be taken into consideration is that jobs invested different opinions by different people: now stable jobs that some people prefer may be not regarded as a great job for future to others. Conventionally, under the poor economy circumstance, a stable job could be regard as to lead people to a successful future. Now, because of growing of living standard, people always mention success related with satisfaction of their job. So it is difficult for people to judge if their achievements of working can bring their satisfaction of life.
In conclusion, people are difficult to make a judgment of a job. That is because either advanced technology empowers all industries with imaginative possibility for people or people have a different realization toward jobs from the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-19 | Christine hanna | 81 | view |
| 2018-12-04 | jiaoj27@hotmail.com | 3 | view |
| 2018-10-19 | Mroza | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-19 | Mroza | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Getting advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting advice from friends in your same age 60
- People who cannot accept criticism will not succeed working in teams. 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to make friends with people who can have fun with us than to make friends with people who can help us when we are in need. 70
- It is better for people to have friends who are intelligent than to have friends who have a good sense of humor 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
People always concerns whether or not their jobs can provide them with a stea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... realization toward jobs from the past.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0748502994 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93244024322 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511976047904 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 544.5 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5307077203 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.071428571 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0840923211247 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373626324922 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368612114272 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0661556327988 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310463695105 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.