Nowadays parents learn more from their children than the children from their parents
There is no doubt that new generations become more intelligent than their previous generations. However, to some extent, they show this intelligibility is highly debated. Some people maintain this view that with the higher intelligibility among new generation, nevertheless, their cleverness is not surpassed former generation. Others, including me, hold the view that there is concrete evidence that they have strong disparities with their parents, which I will delve into it in upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, what there is should be to propagate clever generation. To clarify, people believe that the new generation has become more capable in terms of brain structure and fulfill tasks. This has not been probable without a complex education system, is a base to educate the generation more appropriately. What’s more, it is not available in the past, let alone helping their parents feel the situation. These days, more and more scientists in every different area of study from neuro science to physical activities, are involved in educating the new generation. For every unpredictable flaws in the education system, they have lots of experiments tested, to find solutions and exert for better results. A lot of research, also, are being done to know human demands, subsequently, the new generation. Should they not put a lot of effort into knowing the new generation and investing in their educations, it would be improbable that the new generation reveals any disparity with their former generation.
Furthermore, the other reason is worth mentioning is having access to devices and technologies, unavailable to the previous generation. These have changed the information level accessibility fro the new generation. Now, they are able to surf the internet uninterruptedly to find answers to their difficult questions. Moreover, they have become more sociable. Having access to the internet, they have become so talented either in accomplishing their tasks or making new friends. They have changed the roles their parents followed, now, if their parents need to raise their knowledge about contemporary issues, the new generation could resolve their problems with new ideas. Not because they have access to new technologies, which were unavailable in the past, these devices make them more intelligent and roughness about new impediments.
To sum up, the ingenuity of the new generation is not a hidden fact. This is not because of many efforts and investigations on resolving new generation problems, like education, but of the fact that accessibility of devices and new technologies, which if we could not say absent, was rare.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 27, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
... paragraphs. To begin with, what there is should be to propagate clever generatio...
^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...ged the information level accessibility fro the new generation. Now, they are able ...
^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... of devices and new technologies, which if we could not say absent, was rare.
^^
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h if we could not say absent, was rare.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, no doubt, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2233.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39371980676 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06490521208 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51690821256 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2252286625 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176234528241 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580493405944 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726021476392 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10121978971 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602369695084 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.