One can know a lot about a person from the type of friends this person has.
No matter at workplace or school, it is not rare to see small groups of people hanging out together, and this phenomenon raises an interesting question: whether or not can a person be known by observing the kinds of friends he has. From my perspective, the answer is positive. Information like interests, characters and even the educational background of a person can be acquired in this way. I will explain it one by one.
What must be prioritized is that people with the same interests tend to become intimate friends. As a matter of fact, it is having the same hobbies that friends develop a strong bond. Students are a good example. There are a large number of students who gains pleasure from watching animation, leading them to devote a plethora of time on engaging in online and offline activities. Another example is Marvel fans, who love to gather together to share various models of Marvel heroes.
Moreover, knowing the friends of a person enables us to perceive his characters. To illustrate, there are typically two types of people: extrovert and introvert ones. On one hand, extrovert people, who are talkative and outgoing, have a tendency of enjoying lots of friends; while on the other hand, introvert people are usually quiet, with a few intimate friends. In a TV show “Bojack Horseman”, the husband Mr. P, a typical example of extroversion, enjoys having parties with numerous friends. By contrary, his wife Ms. D would stay on the roof to talk to her friend in person about her happiness and sadness.
Third, not only can we know the interests and characters of a person, but also the educational background can be deducted. Imagine a student born in a noble family in the UK. Wouldn't most of his friends are from decent families and studying in public schools? What are the chances that this child is a good friend of a new refugee immigrant? The same principle suits the adults’ world. The better the education a person received, the greater the opportunities he might have. For instance, my cousin was graduated from Peking University. After graduation, he went to work in Shanghai and meet with his classmates, who were also his friends, once a week. They would share business and working experience or simply enjoy a good cup of coffee. Classmates from the same school became lifelong friends.
In sum, as a member of modern society, it is natural for us to communicate with those who share similar hobbies and educational backgrounds. An effective way to know about a person is to talk to his friend and to watch the way that the person interacts with his friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...nomenon raises an interesting question: whether or not can a person be known by observing the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... Students are a good example. There are a large number of students who gains pleasure from watchi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Wouldn't
...udent born in a noble family in the UK. Wouldnt most of his friends are from decent fam...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, third, while, for instance, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2172.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86995515695 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80123370206 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547085201794 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0743999338 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5384615385 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1538461538 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65384615385 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34173972258 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764897064032 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079062411444 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179991229489 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854260079128 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.